2002Action in Teacher EducationRequires access

Beyond Standardization: Testing and Assessment in Standards-Based Reform

Qiuyun Lin

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

From the perspectives of learning theories, the paper discusses the roles of testing and assessment in meeting real academic goals in standards-based reform. It argues that performance-based alternative assessment, which is based on modern constructivists' view of learning, has advantages over high-stakes standardized testing which can be traced back to traditional theory of behaviorism. To help teachers design an appropriate alternative assessment, the paper offers suggestions on what teachers should know and be able to do according to the standards. The paper concludes that teachers should create a curriculum based on dynamic, performance-based assessment to assess students armed with thinking skills for the 21st century.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

From the perspectives of learning theories, the paper discusses the roles of testing and assessment in meeting real academic goals in standards-based reform. It argues that performance-based alternative assessment, which is based on modern constructivists' view of learning, has advantages over high-stakes standardized testing which can be traced back to traditional theory of behaviorism. To help teachers design an appropriate alternative assessment, the paper offers suggestions on what teachers should know and be able to do according to the standards. The paper concludes that teachers should create a curriculum based on dynamic, performance-based assessment to assess students armed with thinking skills for the 21st century.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

From the perspectives of learning theories, the paper discusses the roles of testing and assessment in meeting real academic goals in standards-based reform. It argues that performance-based alternative assessment, which is based on modern constructivists' view of learning, has advantages over high-stakes standardized testing which can be traced back to traditional theory of behaviorism. To help teachers design an appropriate alternative assessment, the paper offers suggestions on what teachers should know and be able to do according to the standards. The paper concludes that teachers should create a curriculum based on dynamic, performance-based assessment to assess students armed with thinking skills for the 21st century.

Key concepts: Standardization, Standards-based assessment, Standardized test, Behaviorism, Alternative assessment, Academic standards, Learning standards, Curriculum

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Beyond Standardization: Testing and Assessment in Standards-Based Reform — Research Paper | ScholarLens