Judicial Accoutability - International Standards and Experiences of some Countries in the Wolrd
Trinh Quoc Toan, Dang Minh Tuan
Abstract
Open-access reader
Trinh Quoc Toan, Dang Minh Tuan
Abstract
Open-access reader
Judicial accountability is a matter of great concern in the international, regional and national community, as judicial accountability assures accountability for serious judicial misconduct, such as crimes, corruption and human rights violations. Judicial accountability, however, is understood and implemented through a variety of mechanisms and forms in different countries. One of the contentious and controversial issues is how to put judicial accountability in relation to another core principle of the judiciairy - judicial independence. In this way, the international community and some regions have made efforts to develop a number of standards and recommendations on the mechanisms and forms of judicial accountability. Keywords: Judicial accountability is a matter of great concern in the international, regional and national community, as judicial accountability assures accountability for serious judicial misconduct, such as crimes, corruption and human rights violations. Judicial accountability, however, is understood and implemented through a variety of mechanisms and forms in different countries. One of the contentious and controversial issues is how to put judicial accountability in relation to another core principle of the judiciairy - judicial independence. In this way, the international community and some regions have made efforts to develop a number of standards and recommendations on the mechanisms and forms of judicial accountability. Keywords: Judicial accountability, judicial, court, judge, international law, countries.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Judicial accountability is a matter of great concern in the international, regional and national community, as judicial accountability assures accountability for serious judicial misconduct, such as crimes, corruption and human rights violations. Judicial accountability, however, is understood and implemented through a variety of mechanisms and forms in different countries. One of the contentious and controversial issues is how to put judicial accountability in relation to another core principle of the judiciairy - judicial independence. In this way, the international community and some regions have made efforts to develop a number of standards and recommendations on the mechanisms and forms of judicial accountability. Keywords: Judicial accountability is a matter of great concern in the international, regional and national community, as judicial accountability assures accountability for serious judicial misconduct, such as crimes, corruption and human rights violations. Judicial accountability, however, is understood and implemented through a variety of mechanisms and forms in different countries. One of the contentious and controversial issues is how to put judicial accountability in relation to another core principle of the judiciairy - judicial independence. In this way, the international community and some regions have made efforts to develop a number of standards and recommendations on the mechanisms and forms of judicial accountability. Keywords: Judicial accountability, judicial, court, judge, international law, countries.
Key concepts: Accountability, Judicial independence, Misconduct, Judicial activism, Judicial review, Political science, Judicial discretion, Variety (cybernetics)