2019VNU Journal of Science Legal StudiesOpen access

Judicial Accoutability - International Standards and Experiences of some Countries in the Wolrd

Trinh Quoc Toan, Dang Minh Tuan

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Judicial accountability is a matter of great concern in the international, regional and national community, as judicial accountability assures accountability for serious judicial misconduct, such as crimes, corruption and human rights violations. Judicial accountability, however, is understood and implemented through a variety of mechanisms and forms in different countries. One of the contentious and controversial issues is how to put judicial accountability in relation to another core principle of the judiciairy - judicial independence. In this way, the international community and some regions have made efforts to develop a number of standards and recommendations on the mechanisms and forms of judicial accountability. Keywords: Judicial accountability is a matter of great concern in the international, regional and national community, as judicial accountability assures accountability for serious judicial misconduct, such as crimes, corruption and human rights violations. Judicial accountability, however, is understood and implemented through a variety of mechanisms and forms in different countries. One of the contentious and controversial issues is how to put judicial accountability in relation to another core principle of the judiciairy - judicial independence. In this way, the international community and some regions have made efforts to develop a number of standards and recommendations on the mechanisms and forms of judicial accountability. Keywords: Judicial accountability, judicial, court, judge, international law, countries.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Judicial accountability is a matter of great concern in the international, regional and national community, as judicial accountability assures accountability for serious judicial misconduct, such as crimes, corruption and human rights violations. Judicial accountability, however, is understood and implemented through a variety of mechanisms and forms in different countries. One of the contentious and controversial issues is how to put judicial accountability in relation to another core principle of the judiciairy - judicial independence. In this way, the international community and some regions have made efforts to develop a number of standards and recommendations on the mechanisms and forms of judicial accountability. Keywords: Judicial accountability is a matter of great concern in the international, regional and national community, as judicial accountability assures accountability for serious judicial misconduct, such as crimes, corruption and human rights violations. Judicial accountability, however, is understood and implemented through a variety of mechanisms and forms in different countries. One of the contentious and controversial issues is how to put judicial accountability in relation to another core principle of the judiciairy - judicial independence. In this way, the international community and some regions have made efforts to develop a number of standards and recommendations on the mechanisms and forms of judicial accountability. Keywords: Judicial accountability, judicial, court, judge, international law, countries.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Judicial accountability is a matter of great concern in the international, regional and national community, as judicial accountability assures accountability for serious judicial misconduct, such as crimes, corruption and human rights violations. Judicial accountability, however, is understood and implemented through a variety of mechanisms and forms in different countries. One of the contentious and controversial issues is how to put judicial accountability in relation to another core principle of the judiciairy - judicial independence. In this way, the international community and some regions have made efforts to develop a number of standards and recommendations on the mechanisms and forms of judicial accountability. Keywords: Judicial accountability is a matter of great concern in the international, regional and national community, as judicial accountability assures accountability for serious judicial misconduct, such as crimes, corruption and human rights violations. Judicial accountability, however, is understood and implemented through a variety of mechanisms and forms in different countries. One of the contentious and controversial issues is how to put judicial accountability in relation to another core principle of the judiciairy - judicial independence. In this way, the international community and some regions have made efforts to develop a number of standards and recommendations on the mechanisms and forms of judicial accountability. Keywords: Judicial accountability, judicial, court, judge, international law, countries.

Key concepts: Accountability, Judicial independence, Misconduct, Judicial activism, Judicial review, Political science, Judicial discretion, Variety (cybernetics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Judicial Accoutability - International Standards and Experiences of some Countries in the Wolrd — Research Paper | ScholarLens