A CASE AGAINST CONTINUING USE OF THE SPEARMAN FORMULA FOR RANK-ORDER CORRELATION
Dennis M. Roberts
Abstract
Dennis M. Roberts
Abstract
Historical development of the Pearson correlation and the Spearman analog on the ranks was traced to delineate the basis on which the Spearman formula was derived. Following this, recommendations from current statistical textbooks on the use of the Spearman formula were presented. Arguments of computational simplicity, appropriateness when data are not at the interval level, and appropriateness when the relation between X and Y is monotonic but nonlinear for using Spearman were found deficient. Results from a small simulation study also supported this view.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Historical development of the Pearson correlation and the Spearman analog on the ranks was traced to delineate the basis on which the Spearman formula was derived. Following this, recommendations from current statistical textbooks on the use of the Spearman formula were presented. Arguments of computational simplicity, appropriateness when data are not at the interval level, and appropriateness when the relation between X and Y is monotonic but nonlinear for using Spearman were found deficient. Results from a small simulation study also supported this view.
Key concepts: Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, Rank correlation, Statistics, Correlation, Monotonic function, Mathematics, Rank (graph theory), Psychology