2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Patent Infringement Damages

Ronen Arad, Mike P. Arnold, Christopher C. Barry, Vincent E. O'Brien

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter explains how compensation to the patentee for infringement of any patent can take the form of lost profits or reasonable royalty damages. Compensation for infringement of a design patent can also include damages for unjust enrichment. It discusses the lost profit damages and additional Remedy for Infringement of design patent, explaining how the patent's term affects damages. The practitioner should be familiar with the causal link between the infringement and the harm being measured. One cannot assume that the infringement automatically led to the patentee's lower sales and profits. The plaintiff generally demonstrates demand for the patented product by showing significant sales of the infringing product. A product need not duplicate another for users to consider it a suitable substitute. It need only resemble the product enough that consumers would purchase it in place of another product.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter explains how compensation to the patentee for infringement of any patent can take the form of lost profits or reasonable royalty damages. Compensation for infringement of a design patent can also include damages for unjust enrichment. It discusses the lost profit damages and additional Remedy for Infringement of design patent, explaining how the patent's term affects damages. The practitioner should be familiar with the causal link between the infringement and the harm being measured. One cannot assume that the infringement automatically led to the patentee's lower sales and profits. The plaintiff generally demonstrates demand for the patented product by showing significant sales of the infringing product. A product need not duplicate another for users to consider it a suitable substitute. It need only resemble the product enough that consumers would purchase it in place of another product.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter explains how compensation to the patentee for infringement of any patent can take the form of lost profits or reasonable royalty damages. Compensation for infringement of a design patent can also include damages for unjust enrichment. It discusses the lost profit damages and additional Remedy for Infringement of design patent, explaining how the patent's term affects damages. The practitioner should be familiar with the causal link between the infringement and the harm being measured. One cannot assume that the infringement automatically led to the patentee's lower sales and profits. The plaintiff generally demonstrates demand for the patented product by showing significant sales of the infringing product. A product need not duplicate another for users to consider it a suitable substitute. It need only resemble the product enough that consumers would purchase it in place of another product.

Key concepts: Damages, Patent infringement, Business, Harm, Plaintiff, Profit (economics), Product (mathematics), Compensation (psychology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Patent Infringement Damages — Research Paper | ScholarLens