1995•Arab Law QuarterlyRequires access

To Claim Damages for Wrongful Attachment, the Plaintiffs Must Prove Bad Intention and That the Damages Were Intended

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract In an action filed before the Dubai Court, where the plaintiffs claimed damages for wrongful attachment, the court held that the plaintiffs are not entitled to claim damages as the plaintiffs who had brought action against them in the main action and obtained an order for an attachment against the plaintiffs assets did not intend to cause damages. The court held that litigation and using the court process is a right granted to all persons and the plaintiff to such an action will not be liable to pay damages if he uses his rights as any other average person according to the law. However, if the plaintiff intended damages or seeks illegal benefits out of the proceedings, damages will be awarded. Otherwise damages will not be awarded when a person is seeking legal protection under the law, even if his action caused damage to other persons.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In an action filed before the Dubai Court, where the plaintiffs claimed damages for wrongful attachment, the court held that the plaintiffs are not entitled to claim damages as the plaintiffs who had brought action against them in the main action and obtained an order for an attachment against the plaintiffs assets did not intend to cause damages. The court held that litigation and using the court process is a right granted to all persons and the plaintiff to such an action will not be liable to pay damages if he uses his rights as any other average person according to the law. However, if the plaintiff intended damages or seeks illegal benefits out of the proceedings, damages will be awarded. Otherwise damages will not be awarded when a person is seeking legal protection under the law, even if his action caused damage to other persons.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In an action filed before the Dubai Court, where the plaintiffs claimed damages for wrongful attachment, the court held that the plaintiffs are not entitled to claim damages as the plaintiffs who had brought action against them in the main action and obtained an order for an attachment against the plaintiffs assets did not intend to cause damages. The court held that litigation and using the court process is a right granted to all persons and the plaintiff to such an action will not be liable to pay damages if he uses his rights as any other average person according to the law. However, if the plaintiff intended damages or seeks illegal benefits out of the proceedings, damages will be awarded. Otherwise damages will not be awarded when a person is seeking legal protection under the law, even if his action caused damage to other persons.

Key concepts: Damages, Plaintiff, Law, Cause of action, Action (physics), Business, Political science, Quantum mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
To Claim Damages for Wrongful Attachment, the Plaintiffs Must Prove Bad Intention and That the Damages Were Intended — Research Paper | ScholarLens