2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Quality Assessment

Anil Fernando, Stewart Worrall, Erhan Ekmekcioǧlu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses metrics for 2D video quality, and then examines the issues that affect 3D video quality. It describes the methods of measuring 3D video quality using panels of viewers. The chapter provides a method for evaluating 3D video quality that correlates well with the HVS. Even though there are 2D objective quality models that are highly correlated with the HVS, very little work has been carried out on modelling perceptual quality attributes of 3D video. Objective 3D quality assessment is still far from being mature. Objective video quality assessment (for both3Dand 2D) is generally classified as follows: full-reference objective video quality assessment (FR); no-reference objective video quality assessment (NR); and reduced-reference objective video quality assessment (RR). Controlled Vocabulary Terms three-dimensional displays; video communication

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses metrics for 2D video quality, and then examines the issues that affect 3D video quality. It describes the methods of measuring 3D video quality using panels of viewers. The chapter provides a method for evaluating 3D video quality that correlates well with the HVS. Even though there are 2D objective quality models that are highly correlated with the HVS, very little work has been carried out on modelling perceptual quality attributes of 3D video. Objective 3D quality assessment is still far from being mature. Objective video quality assessment (for both3Dand 2D) is generally classified as follows: full-reference objective video quality assessment (FR); no-reference objective video quality assessment (NR); and reduced-reference objective video quality assessment (RR). Controlled Vocabulary Terms three-dimensional displays; video communication

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses metrics for 2D video quality, and then examines the issues that affect 3D video quality. It describes the methods of measuring 3D video quality using panels of viewers. The chapter provides a method for evaluating 3D video quality that correlates well with the HVS. Even though there are 2D objective quality models that are highly correlated with the HVS, very little work has been carried out on modelling perceptual quality attributes of 3D video. Objective 3D quality assessment is still far from being mature. Objective video quality assessment (for both3Dand 2D) is generally classified as follows: full-reference objective video quality assessment (FR); no-reference objective video quality assessment (NR); and reduced-reference objective video quality assessment (RR). Controlled Vocabulary Terms three-dimensional displays; video communication

Key concepts: Subjective video quality, Video quality, Quality (philosophy), Quality assessment, PEVQ, Computer science, Perception, Quality Score

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quality Assessment — Research Paper | ScholarLens