2020Unpublished venueRequires access

Towards Better Quality Assessment of High-Quality Videos

Suiyi Ling, Yoann Baveye, Deepthi Nandakumar, Sriram Sethuraman, Patrick Le Callet

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

In recent times, video content encoded at High-Definition (HD) and Ultra-High-Definition (UHD) resolution dominates internet traffic. The significantly increased data rate and growing expectations of video quality from users create great challenges in video compression and quality assessment, especially for higher-resolution, higher-quality content. The development of robust video quality assessment metrics relies on the collection of subjective ground truths. As high-quality video content is more ambiguous and difficult for a human observer to rate, a more distinguishable subjective protocol/methodology should be considered. In this study, towards better quality assessment of high-quality videos, a subjective study was conducted focusing on high-quality HD and UHD content with the Degradation Category Rating (DCR) protocol. Commonly used video quality metrics were benchmarked in two quality ranges.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In recent times, video content encoded at High-Definition (HD) and Ultra-High-Definition (UHD) resolution dominates internet traffic. The significantly increased data rate and growing expectations of video quality from users create great challenges in video compression and quality assessment, especially for higher-resolution, higher-quality content. The development of robust video quality assessment metrics relies on the collection of subjective ground truths. As high-quality video content is more ambiguous and difficult for a human observer to rate, a more distinguishable subjective protocol/methodology should be considered. In this study, towards better quality assessment of high-quality videos, a subjective study was conducted focusing on high-quality HD and UHD content with the Degradation Category Rating (DCR) protocol. Commonly used video quality metrics were benchmarked in two quality ranges.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In recent times, video content encoded at High-Definition (HD) and Ultra-High-Definition (UHD) resolution dominates internet traffic. The significantly increased data rate and growing expectations of video quality from users create great challenges in video compression and quality assessment, especially for higher-resolution, higher-quality content. The development of robust video quality assessment metrics relies on the collection of subjective ground truths. As high-quality video content is more ambiguous and difficult for a human observer to rate, a more distinguishable subjective protocol/methodology should be considered. In this study, towards better quality assessment of high-quality videos, a subjective study was conducted focusing on high-quality HD and UHD content with the Degradation Category Rating (DCR) protocol. Commonly used video quality metrics were benchmarked in two quality ranges.

Key concepts: Subjective video quality, Video quality, Computer science, Quality (philosophy), PEVQ, Quality assessment, High-definition video, Protocol (science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Towards Better Quality Assessment of High-Quality Videos — Research Paper | ScholarLens