2017•Unpublished venueOpen access

A comparison among cognitive architectures

Danilo Fernando Lucentini

Abstract

This work presents a theoretical and practical comparison of three popular cognitive architectures: SOAR, CLARION, and LIDA.The theoretical comparison is performed based on a set of cognitive functions supposed to exist in the human cognitive cycle.The practical comparison is performed applying the same experiment in all architectures, collecting some data and comparing them using a set of software quality metrics as a basis.The aim is to emphasize similarities and differences among the models and implementations, with the purpose to advise a newcomer on how to choose the appropriated architecture for an application.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Key concepts: Soar, CLARION, LIDA, Cognitive architecture, Computer science, Set (abstract data type), Cognition, Architecture