2015•Procedia Computer ScienceOpen access

A Comparison Among Cognitive Architectures: A Theoretical Analysis

Danilo Fernando Lucentini, Ricardo Gudwin

Abstract

In this paper we present a theoretical comparison among three of the most popular cognitive architectures: SOAR, LIDA and CLARION. These architectures are compared based on a set of cognitive functions supposed to exist in the human cognitive cycle, and how each architecture deals with them. The comparison emphasizes similarities and differences among the architectures, with the purpose to advise a potential user how to identify the best architecture to employ, depending on the situation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Key concepts: Soar, CLARION, LIDA, Computer science, Cognitive architecture, Architecture, Cognition, Set (abstract data type)