1996Allergy and Asthma ProceedingsRequires access

Theophylline Revisited

Gilbert E. D’Alonzo

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

For over 50 years, theophylline has been used regularly for the management of chronic asthma. However, because of its perceived narrow therapeutic index and the fact that it has been considered a weak bronchodilator, the use of theophylline therapy has diminished. Furthermore, with the introduction of newer pharmacologic agents and recommendations in widely accepted guidelines, both nationally and internationally, have further contributed to its decreased use. For years, theophylline has not only been considered a bronchodilator, but for many clinicians, an agent that could be used to enhance respiratory muscle function and mucociliary clearance and act at the level of the central nervous system to enhance ventilation. These properties were felt to be potentially useful for patients with severe exacerbated asthma. Recent studies have suggested that theophylline therapy can play a beneficial role in the management of both chronic stable asthma and exacerbated disease treated in the emergency department setting. Furthermore, a growing body of evidence suggests that theophylline has certain antiinflammatory and immunomodulating properties, even at plasma concentration levels below the accepted therapeutic range. If this is true, then theophylline may act best as a controller medication in the management of asthma. Because of its low cost and its ease of administration, theophylline therapy should be revisited and discussed as not only a reliever of bronchospasm, but a controller of chronic asthma.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For over 50 years, theophylline has been used regularly for the management of chronic asthma. However, because of its perceived narrow therapeutic index and the fact that it has been considered a weak bronchodilator, the use of theophylline therapy has diminished. Furthermore, with the introduction of newer pharmacologic agents and recommendations in widely accepted guidelines, both nationally and internationally, have further contributed to its decreased use. For years, theophylline has not only been considered a bronchodilator, but for many clinicians, an agent that could be used to enhance respiratory muscle function and mucociliary clearance and act at the level of the central nervous system to enhance ventilation. These properties were felt to be potentially useful for patients with severe exacerbated asthma. Recent studies have suggested that theophylline therapy can play a beneficial role in the management of both chronic stable asthma and exacerbated disease treated in the emergency department setting. Furthermore, a growing body of evidence suggests that theophylline has certain antiinflammatory and immunomodulating properties, even at plasma concentration levels below the accepted therapeutic range. If this is true, then theophylline may act best as a controller medication in the management of asthma. Because of its low cost and its ease of administration, theophylline therapy should be revisited and discussed as not only a reliever of bronchospasm, but a controller of chronic asthma.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For over 50 years, theophylline has been used regularly for the management of chronic asthma. However, because of its perceived narrow therapeutic index and the fact that it has been considered a weak bronchodilator, the use of theophylline therapy has diminished. Furthermore, with the introduction of newer pharmacologic agents and recommendations in widely accepted guidelines, both nationally and internationally, have further contributed to its decreased use. For years, theophylline has not only been considered a bronchodilator, but for many clinicians, an agent that could be used to enhance respiratory muscle function and mucociliary clearance and act at the level of the central nervous system to enhance ventilation. These properties were felt to be potentially useful for patients with severe exacerbated asthma. Recent studies have suggested that theophylline therapy can play a beneficial role in the management of both chronic stable asthma and exacerbated disease treated in the emergency department setting. Furthermore, a growing body of evidence suggests that theophylline has certain antiinflammatory and immunomodulating properties, even at plasma concentration levels below the accepted therapeutic range. If this is true, then theophylline may act best as a controller medication in the management of asthma. Because of its low cost and its ease of administration, theophylline therapy should be revisited and discussed as not only a reliever of bronchospasm, but a controller of chronic asthma.

Key concepts: Theophylline, Medicine, Bronchodilator, Bronchospasm, Asthma, Intensive care medicine, Therapeutic index, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Theophylline Revisited — Research Paper | ScholarLens