2015•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Objective Becoming

Bradford Skow

Open publisher page 164 citations

Abstract

Abstract Does time pass? This book takes up this central question of metaphysics and defends the "block universe" theory of time, often said to be a theory according to which time does not pass. Since this can be a misleading thing to say a distinction is drawn between "anemic" passage of time and "robust" passage of time; the thesis of the book is that there is no robust passage of time, or "objective becoming." There are in-depth discussions of alternative theories of time, some of which are theories of robust passage: presentism, the moving spotlight theory of time, the growing block theory of time, and the "branching time" theory of time. Chapters 2 through 5 argue that the moving spotlight theory is the best of these. Chapters 6 argues, contra McTaggart and many others, that the moving spotlight theory is consistent, and Chapter 7 argues that it has no trouble saying how fast time passes. Chapters 8 and 9 show how the moving spotlight theory may be made consistent with the special theory of relativity. Chapter 10 discusses whether sense can be made of the idea that we move through time. Finally, Chapters 11 and 12 take up the question whether our "experience of the passage of time" constitutes evidence that favors the moving spotlight theory over the block universe theory of time. Three different arguments from temporal experience are isolated and discussed separately; all are found to fail.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Does time pass? This book takes up this central question of metaphysics and defends the "block universe" theory of time, often said to be a theory according to which time does not pass. Since this can be a misleading thing to say a distinction is drawn between "anemic" passage of time and "robust" passage of time; the thesis of the book is that there is no robust passage of time, or "objective becoming." There are in-depth discussions of alternative theories of time, some of which are theories of robust passage: presentism, the moving spotlight theory of time, the growing block theory of time, and the "branching time" theory of time. Chapters 2 through 5 argue that the moving spotlight theory is the best of these. Chapters 6 argues, contra McTaggart and many others, that the moving spotlight theory is consistent, and Chapter 7 argues that it has no trouble saying how fast time passes. Chapters 8 and 9 show how the moving spotlight theory may be made consistent with the special theory of relativity. Chapter 10 discusses whether sense can be made of the idea that we move through time. Finally, Chapters 11 and 12 take up the question whether our "experience of the passage of time" constitutes evidence that favors the moving spotlight theory over the block universe theory of time. Three different arguments from temporal experience are isolated and discussed separately; all are found to fail.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 164 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Does time pass? This book takes up this central question of metaphysics and defends the "block universe" theory of time, often said to be a theory according to which time does not pass. Since this can be a misleading thing to say a distinction is drawn between "anemic" passage of time and "robust" passage of time; the thesis of the book is that there is no robust passage of time, or "objective becoming." There are in-depth discussions of alternative theories of time, some of which are theories of robust passage: presentism, the moving spotlight theory of time, the growing block theory of time, and the "branching time" theory of time. Chapters 2 through 5 argue that the moving spotlight theory is the best of these. Chapters 6 argues, contra McTaggart and many others, that the moving spotlight theory is consistent, and Chapter 7 argues that it has no trouble saying how fast time passes. Chapters 8 and 9 show how the moving spotlight theory may be made consistent with the special theory of relativity. Chapter 10 discusses whether sense can be made of the idea that we move through time. Finally, Chapters 11 and 12 take up the question whether our "experience of the passage of time" constitutes evidence that favors the moving spotlight theory over the block universe theory of time. Three different arguments from temporal experience are isolated and discussed separately; all are found to fail.

Key concepts: B-theory of time, Presentism, Time travel, Philosophy of space and time, Epistemology, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Objective Becoming — Research Paper | ScholarLens