2022Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The International Community and Atrocity Crimes

Alex J. Bellamy

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Arising from the horrors of Rwanda and Srebrenica, the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) holds that sovereign states have a responsibility to protect their own populations from atrocity crimes, that the international community should encourage and assist individual states to fulfil their responsibility, and that when states are “manifestly failing” to protect their populations, the international community should respond in a “timely and decisive” fashion. This chapter examines the emergence and developments of R2P. It shows that R2P confers responsibilities upon specific actors, but that the principle is grounded in international politics. It is best thought of, therefore, as a “responsibility to try.” The principle’s mixed record in practice should not obscure the fact that the international community increasingly recognizes a collective responsibility to protect populations within other states. The chapter also shows that the allocation of responsibility is complicated by the emergence of non-state armed groups both as perpetrators and protectors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Arising from the horrors of Rwanda and Srebrenica, the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) holds that sovereign states have a responsibility to protect their own populations from atrocity crimes, that the international community should encourage and assist individual states to fulfil their responsibility, and that when states are “manifestly failing” to protect their populations, the international community should respond in a “timely and decisive” fashion. This chapter examines the emergence and developments of R2P. It shows that R2P confers responsibilities upon specific actors, but that the principle is grounded in international politics. It is best thought of, therefore, as a “responsibility to try.” The principle’s mixed record in practice should not obscure the fact that the international community increasingly recognizes a collective responsibility to protect populations within other states. The chapter also shows that the allocation of responsibility is complicated by the emergence of non-state armed groups both as perpetrators and protectors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Arising from the horrors of Rwanda and Srebrenica, the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) holds that sovereign states have a responsibility to protect their own populations from atrocity crimes, that the international community should encourage and assist individual states to fulfil their responsibility, and that when states are “manifestly failing” to protect their populations, the international community should respond in a “timely and decisive” fashion. This chapter examines the emergence and developments of R2P. It shows that R2P confers responsibilities upon specific actors, but that the principle is grounded in international politics. It is best thought of, therefore, as a “responsibility to try.” The principle’s mixed record in practice should not obscure the fact that the international community increasingly recognizes a collective responsibility to protect populations within other states. The chapter also shows that the allocation of responsibility is complicated by the emergence of non-state armed groups both as perpetrators and protectors.

Key concepts: Responsibility to protect, International community, Collective responsibility, State responsibility, Sovereignty, Political science, State (computer science), Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The International Community and Atrocity Crimes — Research Paper | ScholarLens