1993Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

INTEGRAL BRIDGES: ATTRIBUTES AND LIMITATIONS

Burke, P. O. Martin

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

In some areas of the United States, integral bridges are now being used whenever application limits do not favor another type of structure. Integral bridges have numerous favorable attributes and few limitations. Because design provisions can be made for some of the limitations, only application limitations such as length, skew, and curvature should negate the use of integral bridges in favor of their jointed bridge counterparts. Design procedures and details used for the construction of single- and multiple-span integral bridges of continuous moderate length [91 m (300 ft)] are described, and the comparative attributes and limitations of integral and jointed bridges are elaborated on. The integral bridges discussed have shallow, stub-type abutments supported by embankments and piles. For integral bridges with multiple spans, piers are either flexible and attached to the superstructure or semirigid and self-supporting with movable bearings.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In some areas of the United States, integral bridges are now being used whenever application limits do not favor another type of structure. Integral bridges have numerous favorable attributes and few limitations. Because design provisions can be made for some of the limitations, only application limitations such as length, skew, and curvature should negate the use of integral bridges in favor of their jointed bridge counterparts. Design procedures and details used for the construction of single- and multiple-span integral bridges of continuous moderate length [91 m (300 ft)] are described, and the comparative attributes and limitations of integral and jointed bridges are elaborated on. The integral bridges discussed have shallow, stub-type abutments supported by embankments and piles. For integral bridges with multiple spans, piers are either flexible and attached to the superstructure or semirigid and self-supporting with movable bearings.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In some areas of the United States, integral bridges are now being used whenever application limits do not favor another type of structure. Integral bridges have numerous favorable attributes and few limitations. Because design provisions can be made for some of the limitations, only application limitations such as length, skew, and curvature should negate the use of integral bridges in favor of their jointed bridge counterparts. Design procedures and details used for the construction of single- and multiple-span integral bridges of continuous moderate length [91 m (300 ft)] are described, and the comparative attributes and limitations of integral and jointed bridges are elaborated on. The integral bridges discussed have shallow, stub-type abutments supported by embankments and piles. For integral bridges with multiple spans, piers are either flexible and attached to the superstructure or semirigid and self-supporting with movable bearings.

Key concepts: Curvature, Structural engineering, Engineering, Skew, Bridge (graph theory), Pier, Line integral, Integral equation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
INTEGRAL BRIDGES: ATTRIBUTES AND LIMITATIONS — Research Paper | ScholarLens