1985Civil engineeringRequires access

JOINTLESS BRIDGE DECKS

C L Loveall

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

Deck joints in a bridge are the source of many problems over its lifetime. In time, chances are good the joint will leak, permitting water and salt to leak through. Often this leads to deterioration of the concrete pier cap and superstructure beneath. The solution of Tennessee DOT is to eliminate nearly all bridge deck expansion joints and superstructure expansion bearings. For bridges up to about 400 ft long with steel superstructures, and 800 ft long in concrete, this means no expansion joints even at the abutments (with some exceptions). For bridges longer than this, expansion joints are used but only at the abutments. Tennessee DOT reports almost no problems have resulted from using this approach. A few structural details are given to illustrate how Tennessee designs “integral abutments,” and provides fixed connections of the superstructure to the piers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Deck joints in a bridge are the source of many problems over its lifetime. In time, chances are good the joint will leak, permitting water and salt to leak through. Often this leads to deterioration of the concrete pier cap and superstructure beneath. The solution of Tennessee DOT is to eliminate nearly all bridge deck expansion joints and superstructure expansion bearings. For bridges up to about 400 ft long with steel superstructures, and 800 ft long in concrete, this means no expansion joints even at the abutments (with some exceptions). For bridges longer than this, expansion joints are used but only at the abutments. Tennessee DOT reports almost no problems have resulted from using this approach. A few structural details are given to illustrate how Tennessee designs “integral abutments,” and provides fixed connections of the superstructure to the piers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Deck joints in a bridge are the source of many problems over its lifetime. In time, chances are good the joint will leak, permitting water and salt to leak through. Often this leads to deterioration of the concrete pier cap and superstructure beneath. The solution of Tennessee DOT is to eliminate nearly all bridge deck expansion joints and superstructure expansion bearings. For bridges up to about 400 ft long with steel superstructures, and 800 ft long in concrete, this means no expansion joints even at the abutments (with some exceptions). For bridges longer than this, expansion joints are used but only at the abutments. Tennessee DOT reports almost no problems have resulted from using this approach. A few structural details are given to illustrate how Tennessee designs “integral abutments,” and provides fixed connections of the superstructure to the piers.

Key concepts: Expansion joint, Deck, Pier, Superstructure, Structural engineering, Engineering, Joint (building), Bridge (graph theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
JOINTLESS BRIDGE DECKS — Research Paper | ScholarLens