2004DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Open access

Comparison of body fat measurement by dual-energy absorptiometry and bioelectric impedance analysis

N Thammakumpee, R Leelawattana, A Thamprasit

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the percentage of body fat (%BF) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and by bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA). Material and Methods: Between November 2000 and November 2002, the data of subjects undergoing body fat measurement at Songklanagarind Hospital were analyzed. The body fat of all subjects was measured using both DEXA and BIA. DEXA is a standard measurement in this hospital. Demographic data and percent body fat were analyzed. Results: Two hundred and forty nine subjects, 52 males and 197 females, were included in the study. Mean percentage body fat by DEXA was 28.05 ± 8.19 in males and 39.21 ± 6.85 in females. Mean percentage of body fat by BIA was 26.95 ± 6.31 in males and 33.62 ± 6.10 in females. The correlation between DEXA and BIA is good, R = 0.853 (p < 0.001), however, the mean body fat measurement by BIA was significantly lower than that by DEXA in females. Conclusion: There was a good correlation between DEXA and BIA, but the differences were statistically significant in females. BIA may still be useful to dietitians who wish to monitor changes in body fat over the long term.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To compare the percentage of body fat (%BF) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and by bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA). Material and Methods: Between November 2000 and November 2002, the data of subjects undergoing body fat measurement at Songklanagarind Hospital were analyzed. The body fat of all subjects was measured using both DEXA and BIA. DEXA is a standard measurement in this hospital. Demographic data and percent body fat were analyzed. Results: Two hundred and forty nine subjects, 52 males and 197 females, were included in the study. Mean percentage body fat by DEXA was 28.05 ± 8.19 in males and 39.21 ± 6.85 in females. Mean percentage of body fat by BIA was 26.95 ± 6.31 in males and 33.62 ± 6.10 in females. The correlation between DEXA and BIA is good, R = 0.853 (p < 0.001), however, the mean body fat measurement by BIA was significantly lower than that by DEXA in females. Conclusion: There was a good correlation between DEXA and BIA, but the differences were statistically significant in females. BIA may still be useful to dietitians who wish to monitor changes in body fat over the long term.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To compare the percentage of body fat (%BF) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and by bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA). Material and Methods: Between November 2000 and November 2002, the data of subjects undergoing body fat measurement at Songklanagarind Hospital were analyzed. The body fat of all subjects was measured using both DEXA and BIA. DEXA is a standard measurement in this hospital. Demographic data and percent body fat were analyzed. Results: Two hundred and forty nine subjects, 52 males and 197 females, were included in the study. Mean percentage body fat by DEXA was 28.05 ± 8.19 in males and 39.21 ± 6.85 in females. Mean percentage of body fat by BIA was 26.95 ± 6.31 in males and 33.62 ± 6.10 in females. The correlation between DEXA and BIA is good, R = 0.853 (p < 0.001), however, the mean body fat measurement by BIA was significantly lower than that by DEXA in females. Conclusion: There was a good correlation between DEXA and BIA, but the differences were statistically significant in females. BIA may still be useful to dietitians who wish to monitor changes in body fat over the long term.

Key concepts: Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Dual (grammatical number), Biomedical engineering, Materials science, Medicine, Internal medicine, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of body fat measurement by dual-energy absorptiometry and bioelectric impedance analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens