2012Journal of the South China Agricultural UniversityRequires access

Water conservation effects of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis and Acacia crassicarpa plantations.

Luo LiuJuan, Wei Lidian, He Bin, Meng Chunjiang, Liang Li-hong, Hongying Liu, Liu Li, Qin ZuoYu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In order to investigate the water conservation effects of Eucalyptus urophylla×E.grandis and Acacia crassicarpa plantations,plots with similar stand conditions were selected,and comparative studies were made on water-holding capacity of canopy,vegetation layer under canopy,litter layer and soil.Results showed that water-holding capacity in different layers of two different plantations were in the order of soil layerlitter layercanopyvegetation layer under canopy.The water-holding capacity of canopy,litter layer,and the water-holding capacity of soil were in the order of A.crasscarpa plantationE.urophylla×E.grandis plantations,but the water-holding capacity of layer under canopy was just the opposite.The total water-storage capacity both above ground and soil in E.urophylla× E.grandis and A.crasscarpa plantation were 1 852.82 and 1 917.72 t/hm2 respectively,and the total value of water conservation for the two plantations were 1 241.39 and 1 284.87 yuan/hm2,respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to investigate the water conservation effects of Eucalyptus urophylla×E.grandis and Acacia crassicarpa plantations,plots with similar stand conditions were selected,and comparative studies were made on water-holding capacity of canopy,vegetation layer under canopy,litter layer and soil.Results showed that water-holding capacity in different layers of two different plantations were in the order of soil layerlitter layercanopyvegetation layer under canopy.The water-holding capacity of canopy,litter layer,and the water-holding capacity of soil were in the order of A.crasscarpa plantationE.urophylla×E.grandis plantations,but the water-holding capacity of layer under canopy was just the opposite.The total water-storage capacity both above ground and soil in E.urophylla× E.grandis and A.crasscarpa plantation were 1 852.82 and 1 917.72 t/hm2 respectively,and the total value of water conservation for the two plantations were 1 241.39 and 1 284.87 yuan/hm2,respectively.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to investigate the water conservation effects of Eucalyptus urophylla×E.grandis and Acacia crassicarpa plantations,plots with similar stand conditions were selected,and comparative studies were made on water-holding capacity of canopy,vegetation layer under canopy,litter layer and soil.Results showed that water-holding capacity in different layers of two different plantations were in the order of soil layerlitter layercanopyvegetation layer under canopy.The water-holding capacity of canopy,litter layer,and the water-holding capacity of soil were in the order of A.crasscarpa plantationE.urophylla×E.grandis plantations,but the water-holding capacity of layer under canopy was just the opposite.The total water-storage capacity both above ground and soil in E.urophylla× E.grandis and A.crasscarpa plantation were 1 852.82 and 1 917.72 t/hm2 respectively,and the total value of water conservation for the two plantations were 1 241.39 and 1 284.87 yuan/hm2,respectively.

Key concepts: Eucalyptus, Canopy, Acacia, Litter, Environmental science, Tree canopy, Water conservation, Agroforestry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Water conservation effects of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis and Acacia crassicarpa plantations. — Research Paper | ScholarLens