1999Kogan Page eBooksRequires access

Flexibility, enhanced cooperation and the Treaty of Amsterdam

Kerstin Junge

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

The Treaty of Rome talked of ever closer union, and it was always assumed that all member states would move forward together in each stage of European integration. However, following opt-outs in the Maastricht Treaty and further enlargement, it has seemed increasingly likely that the European Union will become less uniform in future. This text explores discussion about the forms that it might take. The author shows that there has been great deal of confusion in the usage of concepts such as multi-speed and a Europe of variable geometry, which the Treaty of Amsterdam has done little to allay. After elucidating the various models of integration implied by the different terms, Junge examines the problems that will be encountered with enlargement and asks whether the flexibility clause will be sufficient to deal with the complexity of the European Union in the 21st Century.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Treaty of Rome talked of ever closer union, and it was always assumed that all member states would move forward together in each stage of European integration. However, following opt-outs in the Maastricht Treaty and further enlargement, it has seemed increasingly likely that the European Union will become less uniform in future. This text explores discussion about the forms that it might take. The author shows that there has been great deal of confusion in the usage of concepts such as multi-speed and a Europe of variable geometry, which the Treaty of Amsterdam has done little to allay. After elucidating the various models of integration implied by the different terms, Junge examines the problems that will be encountered with enlargement and asks whether the flexibility clause will be sufficient to deal with the complexity of the European Union in the 21st Century.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Treaty of Rome talked of ever closer union, and it was always assumed that all member states would move forward together in each stage of European integration. However, following opt-outs in the Maastricht Treaty and further enlargement, it has seemed increasingly likely that the European Union will become less uniform in future. This text explores discussion about the forms that it might take. The author shows that there has been great deal of confusion in the usage of concepts such as multi-speed and a Europe of variable geometry, which the Treaty of Amsterdam has done little to allay. After elucidating the various models of integration implied by the different terms, Junge examines the problems that will be encountered with enlargement and asks whether the flexibility clause will be sufficient to deal with the complexity of the European Union in the 21st Century.

Key concepts: Resizing, Treaty, Flexibility (engineering), European union, Confusion, Maastricht Treaty, Political science, European integration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Flexibility, enhanced cooperation and the Treaty of Amsterdam — Research Paper | ScholarLens