1999Southeastern Political ReviewRequires access

Re‐Writing Maastricht: The Politics of the 1999 Inter‐Governmental Conference

Carol M. Glen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Treaty on European Union (1993), otherwise known as the Maastricht Treaty, made provisions for the convening of an intergovernmental conference to be held during 1996 in order to make revisions to that treaty as required. This paper examines the negotiations surrounding the 1996–97 intergovernmental conference and asks why some issues were successfully incorporated into the new Treaty of Amsterdam which emerged, while others were not. Particular attention is paid to the domestic constraints which several EU leaders faced as they approached the bargaining table, and which effectively blocked compromise. This paper argues that the post‐Maastricht political environment has produced a more realistic view of what is politically possible, but that this has resulted in a new treaty which is uncertain and weak.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Treaty on European Union (1993), otherwise known as the Maastricht Treaty, made provisions for the convening of an intergovernmental conference to be held during 1996 in order to make revisions to that treaty as required. This paper examines the negotiations surrounding the 1996–97 intergovernmental conference and asks why some issues were successfully incorporated into the new Treaty of Amsterdam which emerged, while others were not. Particular attention is paid to the domestic constraints which several EU leaders faced as they approached the bargaining table, and which effectively blocked compromise. This paper argues that the post‐Maastricht political environment has produced a more realistic view of what is politically possible, but that this has resulted in a new treaty which is uncertain and weak.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Treaty on European Union (1993), otherwise known as the Maastricht Treaty, made provisions for the convening of an intergovernmental conference to be held during 1996 in order to make revisions to that treaty as required. This paper examines the negotiations surrounding the 1996–97 intergovernmental conference and asks why some issues were successfully incorporated into the new Treaty of Amsterdam which emerged, while others were not. Particular attention is paid to the domestic constraints which several EU leaders faced as they approached the bargaining table, and which effectively blocked compromise. This paper argues that the post‐Maastricht political environment has produced a more realistic view of what is politically possible, but that this has resulted in a new treaty which is uncertain and weak.

Key concepts: Compromise, Maastricht Treaty, Negotiation, Treaty, Political science, Politics, European union, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Re‐Writing Maastricht: The Politics of the 1999 Inter‐Governmental Conference — Research Paper | ScholarLens