2004Unpublished venueRequires access

EVALUATION AND PRIORITIZATION OF COMMUNITY TRAFFIC STUDIES

R Vanderputten

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The City of Calgary (Alberta, Canada) adopted a Traffic Calming Policy in January, 2003 to provide clear direction on the types of traffic calming measures to be considered in Calgary, and appropriate circumstances for their use. As part of this policy, a framework was developed to evaluate and prioritize communities for neighborhood traffic calming studies. This paper, from a set of conference proceedings on Intersection Safety: Achieving Solutions Through Partnerships (March 2004, Irvine, California), outlines the process in which communities are evaluated and prioritized. Screening is the first step in responding to reported traffic issues, followed by evaluation and prioritization activities. The criteria used reflects the goals of traffic calming, specifically safety and livability, as well as the objectives of reducing speed and short-cutting volume, and minimizing conflicts between road users. Community support is also considered in the evaluation, as a basis for assigning higher priority to areas with higher levels of community support. The author concludes that the evaluation and prioritization process described has been effective in dealing with the public requests for traffic calming studies. The process allows the limited staff resources to best serve the communities most in need.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The City of Calgary (Alberta, Canada) adopted a Traffic Calming Policy in January, 2003 to provide clear direction on the types of traffic calming measures to be considered in Calgary, and appropriate circumstances for their use. As part of this policy, a framework was developed to evaluate and prioritize communities for neighborhood traffic calming studies. This paper, from a set of conference proceedings on Intersection Safety: Achieving Solutions Through Partnerships (March 2004, Irvine, California), outlines the process in which communities are evaluated and prioritized. Screening is the first step in responding to reported traffic issues, followed by evaluation and prioritization activities. The criteria used reflects the goals of traffic calming, specifically safety and livability, as well as the objectives of reducing speed and short-cutting volume, and minimizing conflicts between road users. Community support is also considered in the evaluation, as a basis for assigning higher priority to areas with higher levels of community support. The author concludes that the evaluation and prioritization process described has been effective in dealing with the public requests for traffic calming studies. The process allows the limited staff resources to best serve the communities most in need.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The City of Calgary (Alberta, Canada) adopted a Traffic Calming Policy in January, 2003 to provide clear direction on the types of traffic calming measures to be considered in Calgary, and appropriate circumstances for their use. As part of this policy, a framework was developed to evaluate and prioritize communities for neighborhood traffic calming studies. This paper, from a set of conference proceedings on Intersection Safety: Achieving Solutions Through Partnerships (March 2004, Irvine, California), outlines the process in which communities are evaluated and prioritized. Screening is the first step in responding to reported traffic issues, followed by evaluation and prioritization activities. The criteria used reflects the goals of traffic calming, specifically safety and livability, as well as the objectives of reducing speed and short-cutting volume, and minimizing conflicts between road users. Community support is also considered in the evaluation, as a basis for assigning higher priority to areas with higher levels of community support. The author concludes that the evaluation and prioritization process described has been effective in dealing with the public requests for traffic calming studies. The process allows the limited staff resources to best serve the communities most in need.

Key concepts: Traffic calming, Prioritization, Transport engineering, Process (computing), Intersection (aeronautics), Set (abstract data type), Computer science, Environmental planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EVALUATION AND PRIORITIZATION OF COMMUNITY TRAFFIC STUDIES — Research Paper | ScholarLens