1961•EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University)Open access

Res Ipsa Loquitur in Malpractice Cases in Canada

JOHN H. HARLAND

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

We do not intend here to advocate or condemn application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in malpractice cases, but simply to indicate the cases where it was or was not applied, relying where possible on direct quotation from the judgments.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We do not intend here to advocate or condemn application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in malpractice cases, but simply to indicate the cases where it was or was not applied, relying where possible on direct quotation from the judgments.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We do not intend here to advocate or condemn application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in malpractice cases, but simply to indicate the cases where it was or was not applied, relying where possible on direct quotation from the judgments.

Key concepts: Res ipsa loquitur, Law, Malpractice, Political science, Business, Tort, Liability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Res Ipsa Loquitur in Malpractice Cases in Canada — Research Paper | ScholarLens