Res Ipsa Loquitur in Medical Malpractice Cases
Aaron J. Broder
Abstract
Open-access reader
Aaron J. Broder
Abstract
Open-access reader
BRODER was past President of the New York State Association of Trial Lawyers. He is a member of the American Trial Lawyers Association and American Bar Association.1 Pike v. Honsinger, 155 N.Y.201, 49 N.E.760 (1898) contains a complete statement of the law with respect to the obligation of physicians to conform to community standards.See also 41 Am.JUR.Physicians and Surgeons § 90; 70 C.J.S. Physicians and Surgeons § 41 (1951).These articles explain the requirement that physicians holding themselves out as specialists must conform to the standards of specialists in their community.2
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BRODER was past President of the New York State Association of Trial Lawyers. He is a member of the American Trial Lawyers Association and American Bar Association.1 Pike v. Honsinger, 155 N.Y.201, 49 N.E.760 (1898) contains a complete statement of the law with respect to the obligation of physicians to conform to community standards.See also 41 Am.JUR.Physicians and Surgeons § 90; 70 C.J.S. Physicians and Surgeons § 41 (1951).These articles explain the requirement that physicians holding themselves out as specialists must conform to the standards of specialists in their community.2
Key concepts: Res ipsa loquitur, Medical malpractice, Malpractice, Law, Political science, Tort, Liability