1976The Arithmetic TeacherRequires access

Mathematics—for whom?

David Rappaport

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

If one accepts the year 1957 as the beginning of the “modern mathematics” era for the elementary school and high school mathematics programs, then we are now more than half way through the second decade of the “revolution” in mathematics education. In 1967 a number of speakers at meetings of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics expressed the view that the first decade of the mathematics curriculum reform movement was devoted to developing worthwhile mathematics content, and since that phase of curriculum reform had been accomplished with great success, the second decade should be devoted to the pedagogical issues of how this content can be taught successfully to children. Although many mathematics educators may be satisfied with the mathematics content of the present programs, an increasing number of educators are raising serious questions about these mathematics curriculums.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

If one accepts the year 1957 as the beginning of the “modern mathematics” era for the elementary school and high school mathematics programs, then we are now more than half way through the second decade of the “revolution” in mathematics education. In 1967 a number of speakers at meetings of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics expressed the view that the first decade of the mathematics curriculum reform movement was devoted to developing worthwhile mathematics content, and since that phase of curriculum reform had been accomplished with great success, the second decade should be devoted to the pedagogical issues of how this content can be taught successfully to children. Although many mathematics educators may be satisfied with the mathematics content of the present programs, an increasing number of educators are raising serious questions about these mathematics curriculums.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

If one accepts the year 1957 as the beginning of the “modern mathematics” era for the elementary school and high school mathematics programs, then we are now more than half way through the second decade of the “revolution” in mathematics education. In 1967 a number of speakers at meetings of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics expressed the view that the first decade of the mathematics curriculum reform movement was devoted to developing worthwhile mathematics content, and since that phase of curriculum reform had been accomplished with great success, the second decade should be devoted to the pedagogical issues of how this content can be taught successfully to children. Although many mathematics educators may be satisfied with the mathematics content of the present programs, an increasing number of educators are raising serious questions about these mathematics curriculums.

Key concepts: Reform mathematics, Connected Mathematics, Mathematics education, Math wars, Core-Plus Mathematics Project, Curriculum, Everyday Mathematics, Comprehensive School Mathematics Program

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mathematics—for whom? — Research Paper | ScholarLens