1971The Arithmetic TeacherRequires access

There always are more questions

Douglas E. Cruikshank, Charles De Flandre

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The difference between the elementary mathematics curriculum of two decades ago and that of the last decade is in what we chant. Previously we chanted the “times tables”nd played fast-moving games of “flash card.” Today, after nearly fifteen years of revolution in elementary school mathematics, we chant the associative property and ask, “What plus what equals what plus what?” And we still cling tenaciously to the tables and flash cards. The chant curriculum has caused a continuing emphasis on lower-level cognitive skills, particularly rote memorization. We are not much better off today than two decades ago.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The difference between the elementary mathematics curriculum of two decades ago and that of the last decade is in what we chant. Previously we chanted the “times tables”nd played fast-moving games of “flash card.” Today, after nearly fifteen years of revolution in elementary school mathematics, we chant the associative property and ask, “What plus what equals what plus what?” And we still cling tenaciously to the tables and flash cards. The chant curriculum has caused a continuing emphasis on lower-level cognitive skills, particularly rote memorization. We are not much better off today than two decades ago.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The difference between the elementary mathematics curriculum of two decades ago and that of the last decade is in what we chant. Previously we chanted the “times tables”nd played fast-moving games of “flash card.” Today, after nearly fifteen years of revolution in elementary school mathematics, we chant the associative property and ask, “What plus what equals what plus what?” And we still cling tenaciously to the tables and flash cards. The chant curriculum has caused a continuing emphasis on lower-level cognitive skills, particularly rote memorization. We are not much better off today than two decades ago.

Key concepts: Mathematics education, Memorization, Curriculum, Flash (photography), Rote learning, Pedagogy, Mathematics, Teaching method

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
There always are more questions — Research Paper | ScholarLens