1978Unpublished venueOpen access

Effects of sulfur emission controls on the cost of gasification combined cycle power systems. Final report

S. Feerrar, J. Joiner, J. Kellard, B. McElmurry

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Economic evaluations were performed for a series of coal gasification-combined cycle power generation facilities, each differing in the mode of operation of the sulfur removal unit. The objectives of the study were to determine the added cost of power associated with more stringent sulfur emission requirements as well as the economic impact of the pressure level at which sulfur removal unit was operated. Similar gasification and power generation facilities were used for each evaluation. Identical Texaco type, oxygen-blown, entrained gasifiers were used for all cases. All were integrated with an advanced combined cycle power generation plant based on a design by Westinghouse. The sulfur removal process in each case was Allied Chemical's proprietary Selexol physical solvent process. The mode of operation of the Selexol Unit was varied to achieve a moderate level of sulfur removal at 350 psig and at 1150 psig. Operation to achieve a very ''deep'' level of sulfur removal at 350 psig was also evaluated. The ability to currently achieve the emission requirements specified in the deep sulfur removal case was found questionable, and it was concluded that further development work is necessary. Barring development problems, the cost of power at the stricter emissions level was estimated as 7 to 8% higher than at moderate levels. The economic advantage of high pressure sulfur removal operation was concluded to be insignificant in the cases presented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Economic evaluations were performed for a series of coal gasification-combined cycle power generation facilities, each differing in the mode of operation of the sulfur removal unit. The objectives of the study were to determine the added cost of power associated with more stringent sulfur emission requirements as well as the economic impact of the pressure level at which sulfur removal unit was operated. Similar gasification and power generation facilities were used for each evaluation. Identical Texaco type, oxygen-blown, entrained gasifiers were used for all cases. All were integrated with an advanced combined cycle power generation plant based on a design by Westinghouse. The sulfur removal process in each case was Allied Chemical's proprietary Selexol physical solvent process. The mode of operation of the Selexol Unit was varied to achieve a moderate level of sulfur removal at 350 psig and at 1150 psig. Operation to achieve a very ''deep'' level of sulfur removal at 350 psig was also evaluated. The ability to currently achieve the emission requirements specified in the deep sulfur removal case was found questionable, and it was concluded that further development work is necessary. Barring development problems, the cost of power at the stricter emissions level was estimated as 7 to 8% higher than at moderate levels. The economic advantage of high pressure sulfur removal operation was concluded to be insignificant in the cases presented.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Economic evaluations were performed for a series of coal gasification-combined cycle power generation facilities, each differing in the mode of operation of the sulfur removal unit. The objectives of the study were to determine the added cost of power associated with more stringent sulfur emission requirements as well as the economic impact of the pressure level at which sulfur removal unit was operated. Similar gasification and power generation facilities were used for each evaluation. Identical Texaco type, oxygen-blown, entrained gasifiers were used for all cases. All were integrated with an advanced combined cycle power generation plant based on a design by Westinghouse. The sulfur removal process in each case was Allied Chemical's proprietary Selexol physical solvent process. The mode of operation of the Selexol Unit was varied to achieve a moderate level of sulfur removal at 350 psig and at 1150 psig. Operation to achieve a very ''deep'' level of sulfur removal at 350 psig was also evaluated. The ability to currently achieve the emission requirements specified in the deep sulfur removal case was found questionable, and it was concluded that further development work is necessary. Barring development problems, the cost of power at the stricter emissions level was estimated as 7 to 8% higher than at moderate levels. The economic advantage of high pressure sulfur removal operation was concluded to be insignificant in the cases presented.

Key concepts: Sulfur, Integrated gasification combined cycle, Coal, Waste management, Electricity generation, Coal gasification, Work (physics), Process engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of sulfur emission controls on the cost of gasification combined cycle power systems. Final report — Research Paper | ScholarLens