2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Behavior of Reinforced Earth Retaining Wall Driving the Settlement of Reinforcement using Centrifuge Modeling

Kwangkuk Ahn, Jae‐Il Kim, Cheo-Keun Lee, Tae-Ick Chung

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The conventional reinforced earth retaining wall has the connector system to fix the reinforcement and block. However, this system may cause the crack of block and the rupture of reinforcement due to the stress concentration near the face of reinforced earth retaining wall. In this study, the new connector system, which is able to allow the settlement of reinforcement, was applied to analyze the effect of connector system of reinforced earth retaining wall. The centrifugal tests for both the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall and reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement were performed to compare the results. As a result, reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement reached to the failure at 80g-level. In contrast, the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall was collapsed at 69g-level. It means that reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement has the stronger stability than the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall. Also, the tensile force on reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement was less at the point of 0.15H about 1/6~1/2 than that of the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The conventional reinforced earth retaining wall has the connector system to fix the reinforcement and block. However, this system may cause the crack of block and the rupture of reinforcement due to the stress concentration near the face of reinforced earth retaining wall. In this study, the new connector system, which is able to allow the settlement of reinforcement, was applied to analyze the effect of connector system of reinforced earth retaining wall. The centrifugal tests for both the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall and reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement were performed to compare the results. As a result, reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement reached to the failure at 80g-level. In contrast, the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall was collapsed at 69g-level. It means that reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement has the stronger stability than the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall. Also, the tensile force on reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement was less at the point of 0.15H about 1/6~1/2 than that of the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The conventional reinforced earth retaining wall has the connector system to fix the reinforcement and block. However, this system may cause the crack of block and the rupture of reinforcement due to the stress concentration near the face of reinforced earth retaining wall. In this study, the new connector system, which is able to allow the settlement of reinforcement, was applied to analyze the effect of connector system of reinforced earth retaining wall. The centrifugal tests for both the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall and reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement were performed to compare the results. As a result, reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement reached to the failure at 80g-level. In contrast, the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall was collapsed at 69g-level. It means that reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement has the stronger stability than the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall. Also, the tensile force on reinforced earth retaining wall driving the settlement of reinforcement was less at the point of 0.15H about 1/6~1/2 than that of the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall.

Key concepts: Retaining wall, Reinforcement, Centrifuge, Mechanically stabilized earth, Settlement (finance), Geotechnical engineering, Structural engineering, Reinforced concrete

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Behavior of Reinforced Earth Retaining Wall Driving the Settlement of Reinforcement using Centrifuge Modeling — Research Paper | ScholarLens