Stress analysis of metal-free polymer crowns using the three-dimensional finite element method.
Toshiki Nakamura, A. Imanishi, H. Kashima, Takashi Ohyama, Shoichi Ishigaki
Abstract
Toshiki Nakamura, A. Imanishi, H. Kashima, Takashi Ohyama, Shoichi Ishigaki
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution under various loading conditions within posterior metal-free crowns made of new composite materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional finite element model representing a mandibular first molar was constructed. Variations of the model had crowns of two types of composite, a glass ceramic, and porcelain fused to metal. A load of 600 N, simulating the maximum bite force, was applied vertically to the crowns. Loads of 225 N, simulating masticatory force, were applied from three directions (vertically, at a 45-degree angle, and horizontally). RESULTS: The stress distributions in both types of composite crown were similar to that of the glass-ceramic crown. In the test simulating maximum bite force, the maximum tensile stresses on all crowns (17.9 to 18.3 MPa) concentrated around the loading points. In the masticatory force-stimulation test, the specimens experienced maximum tensile stresses of 20.3 to 26.6 MPa under a horizontal load and 10.9 to 11.0 MPa under a vertical load. When the load was applied horizontally, the maximum tensile stress was observed around the loading points on the surface in the case of composite and glass-ceramic crowns, and in the cervical area of the metal coping in the porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns. CONCLUSION: It would appear that the strength of occlusal contact points is important to the integrity of posterior metal-free crowns made of new composite materials and that bite forces applied from the horizontal direction are a critical factor determining success and failure.
OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution under various loading conditions within posterior metal-free crowns made of new composite materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional finite element model representing a mandibular first molar was constructed. Variations of the model had crowns of two types of composite, a glass ceramic, and porcelain fused to metal. A load of 600 N, simulating the maximum bite force, was applied vertically to the crowns. Loads of 225 N, simulating masticatory force, were applied from three directions (vertically, at a 45-degree angle, and horizontally). RESULTS: The stress distributions in both types of composite crown were similar to that of the glass-ceramic crown. In the test simulating maximum bite force, the maximum tensile stresses on all crowns (17.9 to 18.3 MPa) concentrated around the loading points. In the masticatory force-stimulation test, the specimens experienced maximum tensile stresses of 20.3 to 26.6 MPa under a horizontal load and 10.9 to 11.0 MPa under a vertical load. When the load was applied horizontally, the maximum tensile stress was observed around the loading points on the surface in the case of composite and glass-ceramic crowns, and in the cervical area of the metal coping in the porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns. CONCLUSION: It would appear that the strength of occlusal contact points is important to the integrity of posterior metal-free crowns made of new composite materials and that bite forces applied from the horizontal direction are a critical factor determining success and failure.
Key concepts: Materials science, Bite force quotient, Crown (dentistry), Composite material, Ultimate tensile strength, Masticatory force, Stress (linguistics), Finite element method