2010Transportation Research Board 89th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

Influence of Laboratory Compaction Methods on Shear Performance of Graded Crushed Stone

Long Wang, Xiaoguang Xie, Fazil Najafi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper presented a study on the effects of two laboratory compaction methods, namely, vibrating compaction and modified proctor compaction on the stress-strain characteristics and shear strength of graded crushed stone. The triaxial shear test results showed that samples made by vibrating compaction possessed higher modulus of rupture, higher initial modulus of elasticity, and lower failure strain values as compared with samples made by the modified proctor compaction. Specifically, the values of cohesion and angle of friction of the samples made by the vibrating compaction increased by 38% and 2 degrees respectively as compared with the samples made by the modified proctor compaction. Also, the shear strength associated with vibrating compaction increased by 20% as compared with the modified proctor compaction case. The main factor contributing to these differences was that the vibrating compaction generated a better distribution of particle orientation angles than the modified proctor compaction. Therefore, in the construction of graded-crushed stone base, it is recommended that primarily a vibrating roller be used for compaction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presented a study on the effects of two laboratory compaction methods, namely, vibrating compaction and modified proctor compaction on the stress-strain characteristics and shear strength of graded crushed stone. The triaxial shear test results showed that samples made by vibrating compaction possessed higher modulus of rupture, higher initial modulus of elasticity, and lower failure strain values as compared with samples made by the modified proctor compaction. Specifically, the values of cohesion and angle of friction of the samples made by the vibrating compaction increased by 38% and 2 degrees respectively as compared with the samples made by the modified proctor compaction. Also, the shear strength associated with vibrating compaction increased by 20% as compared with the modified proctor compaction case. The main factor contributing to these differences was that the vibrating compaction generated a better distribution of particle orientation angles than the modified proctor compaction. Therefore, in the construction of graded-crushed stone base, it is recommended that primarily a vibrating roller be used for compaction.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presented a study on the effects of two laboratory compaction methods, namely, vibrating compaction and modified proctor compaction on the stress-strain characteristics and shear strength of graded crushed stone. The triaxial shear test results showed that samples made by vibrating compaction possessed higher modulus of rupture, higher initial modulus of elasticity, and lower failure strain values as compared with samples made by the modified proctor compaction. Specifically, the values of cohesion and angle of friction of the samples made by the vibrating compaction increased by 38% and 2 degrees respectively as compared with the samples made by the modified proctor compaction. Also, the shear strength associated with vibrating compaction increased by 20% as compared with the modified proctor compaction case. The main factor contributing to these differences was that the vibrating compaction generated a better distribution of particle orientation angles than the modified proctor compaction. Therefore, in the construction of graded-crushed stone base, it is recommended that primarily a vibrating roller be used for compaction.

Key concepts: Compaction, Crushed stone, Geotechnical engineering, Cohesion (chemistry), Proctor compaction test, Materials science, Shear modulus, Modulus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of Laboratory Compaction Methods on Shear Performance of Graded Crushed Stone — Research Paper | ScholarLens