2014•CirculationRequires access

Abstract 17259: Differential Changes in Plaque Behind the Stent After Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Humans: Implications for In-Stent Restenosis?

Ioannis Andreou, Koki Shishido, Antonios P. Antoniadis, Saeko Takahashi, Masaya Tsuda, Michail I. Papafaklis, Shigeru Saito, Ahmet U Coscun, Charles L. Feldman, Peter Howard Stone

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: The natural history and the role of the atherosclerotic plaque located behind the stent (PBS) are still poorly understood. We evaluated the serial changes in PBS following bare-metal (BMS) compared with first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation and the impact of these changes on in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH). Methods: 3D coronary reconstruction by angiography and intravascular ultrasound were serially performed after intervention and at 6- to 10-month follow-up in 157 Japanese patients treated with BMS (n=90) and DES (n=98; 68 sirolimus-eluting and 30 paclitaxel-eluting stents) included in the PREDICTION Study. Each reconstructed stented coronary artery was divided into consecutive 1.5-mm segments. External elastic lamina, lumen, stent, and PBS area were measured for each segment at both baseline and follow-up. At follow-up NIH area was assessed. Due to the very low rate of events in our population we used significant NIH (defined as NIH area >50% of stent area) as a binary anatomic outcome. Results: Patient, lesion, and stent characteristics were comparable between BMS and DES. There was a significant decrease in PBS area after BMS (median relative change: -7.2%, IQR -19.3 to 5.2%, p<0.001) and a significant increase after DES implantation (median relative change: 6.1%, IQR -5.7 to 20.5%, p<0.001). The decrease in PBS area significantly predicted NIH area at follow-up after controlling for baseline lumen area and baseline PBS area in both BMS (β 0.15, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.2, p<0.001) and DES (β 0.09, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.11, p<0.001). The decrease in PBS area was the most powerful predictor of significant NIH in both BMS (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.26, p=0.017) and DES (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.36, p=0.005). Conclusions: The PBS significantly decreased 6 to 10 months after BMS implantation, whereas after DES it increased. The decrease in PBS area was significantly associated with the development of NIH at follow-up in both stent types. These findings raise the possibility of a communication between the lesion within the stent and the underlying native atherosclerotic plaque, and may have important implications regarding the pathobiology of in-stent restenosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The natural history and the role of the atherosclerotic plaque located behind the stent (PBS) are still poorly understood. We evaluated the serial changes in PBS following bare-metal (BMS) compared with first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation and the impact of these changes on in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH). Methods: 3D coronary reconstruction by angiography and intravascular ultrasound were serially performed after intervention and at 6- to 10-month follow-up in 157 Japanese patients treated with BMS (n=90) and DES (n=98; 68 sirolimus-eluting and 30 paclitaxel-eluting stents) included in the PREDICTION Study. Each reconstructed stented coronary artery was divided into consecutive 1.5-mm segments. External elastic lamina, lumen, stent, and PBS area were measured for each segment at both baseline and follow-up. At follow-up NIH area was assessed. Due to the very low rate of events in our population we used significant NIH (defined as NIH area >50% of stent area) as a binary anatomic outcome. Results: Patient, lesion, and stent characteristics were comparable between BMS and DES. There was a significant decrease in PBS area after BMS (median relative change: -7.2%, IQR -19.3 to 5.2%, p<0.001) and a significant increase after DES implantation (median relative change: 6.1%, IQR -5.7 to 20.5%, p<0.001). The decrease in PBS area significantly predicted NIH area at follow-up after controlling for baseline lumen area and baseline PBS area in both BMS (β 0.15, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.2, p<0.001) and DES (β 0.09, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.11, p<0.001). The decrease in PBS area was the most powerful predictor of significant NIH in both BMS (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.26, p=0.017) and DES (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.36, p=0.005). Conclusions: The PBS significantly decreased 6 to 10 months after BMS implantation, whereas after DES it increased. The decrease in PBS area was significantly associated with the development of NIH at follow-up in both stent types. These findings raise the possibility of a communication between the lesion within the stent and the underlying native atherosclerotic plaque, and may have important implications regarding the pathobiology of in-stent restenosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The natural history and the role of the atherosclerotic plaque located behind the stent (PBS) are still poorly understood. We evaluated the serial changes in PBS following bare-metal (BMS) compared with first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation and the impact of these changes on in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH). Methods: 3D coronary reconstruction by angiography and intravascular ultrasound were serially performed after intervention and at 6- to 10-month follow-up in 157 Japanese patients treated with BMS (n=90) and DES (n=98; 68 sirolimus-eluting and 30 paclitaxel-eluting stents) included in the PREDICTION Study. Each reconstructed stented coronary artery was divided into consecutive 1.5-mm segments. External elastic lamina, lumen, stent, and PBS area were measured for each segment at both baseline and follow-up. At follow-up NIH area was assessed. Due to the very low rate of events in our population we used significant NIH (defined as NIH area >50% of stent area) as a binary anatomic outcome. Results: Patient, lesion, and stent characteristics were comparable between BMS and DES. There was a significant decrease in PBS area after BMS (median relative change: -7.2%, IQR -19.3 to 5.2%, p<0.001) and a significant increase after DES implantation (median relative change: 6.1%, IQR -5.7 to 20.5%, p<0.001). The decrease in PBS area significantly predicted NIH area at follow-up after controlling for baseline lumen area and baseline PBS area in both BMS (β 0.15, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.2, p<0.001) and DES (β 0.09, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.11, p<0.001). The decrease in PBS area was the most powerful predictor of significant NIH in both BMS (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.26, p=0.017) and DES (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.36, p=0.005). Conclusions: The PBS significantly decreased 6 to 10 months after BMS implantation, whereas after DES it increased. The decrease in PBS area was significantly associated with the development of NIH at follow-up in both stent types. These findings raise the possibility of a communication between the lesion within the stent and the underlying native atherosclerotic plaque, and may have important implications regarding the pathobiology of in-stent restenosis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Stent, Intravascular ultrasound, Restenosis, Drug-eluting stent, Lumen (anatomy), Bare-metal stent, Neointimal hyperplasia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Abstract 17259: Differential Changes in Plaque Behind the Stent After Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Humans: Implications for In-Stent Restenosis? — Research Paper | ScholarLens