High Temperature Ampacity Model for Overhead Conductors
S. L. Chen, William Z. Black, H.W. Loard
Abstract
S. L. Chen, William Z. Black, H.W. Loard
Abstract
A computer-based ampacity model that can predict the temperature of overhead conductors for temperatures as high as 250 °C has been developed. The model is a revision of a program that has been reliably used for nearly 20 years to calculate the transient ampacity of a wide variety of conductor designs. The accuracy of the program has been determined by comparing the program predictions with temperatures that are measured on a full-scale energized outdoor test span. The accuracy of the program decreases as the average conductor temperature increases. As the conductor temperature increases, the spatial variations, both azimuthal and radial, are magnified, and the task of calculating a single average conductor temperature becomes more challenging. Typical variations in the conductor temperature were as high as 65 °C in a single span when the conductor temperature approached 250 °C. These temperature variations create difficulties when trying to either measure the conductor temperature with hardware attached to the line or predict the temperature with a computer-based ampacity model.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A computer-based ampacity model that can predict the temperature of overhead conductors for temperatures as high as 250 °C has been developed. The model is a revision of a program that has been reliably used for nearly 20 years to calculate the transient ampacity of a wide variety of conductor designs. The accuracy of the program has been determined by comparing the program predictions with temperatures that are measured on a full-scale energized outdoor test span. The accuracy of the program decreases as the average conductor temperature increases. As the conductor temperature increases, the spatial variations, both azimuthal and radial, are magnified, and the task of calculating a single average conductor temperature becomes more challenging. Typical variations in the conductor temperature were as high as 65 °C in a single span when the conductor temperature approached 250 °C. These temperature variations create difficulties when trying to either measure the conductor temperature with hardware attached to the line or predict the temperature with a computer-based ampacity model.
Key concepts: Ampacity, Conductor, Electrical conductor, Overhead (engineering), Span (engineering), Computer program, Transient (computer programming), Materials science