2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

Methods for User Interface Design

Susanne Bødker

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Traditional user interface design has been bound to conventional technology. The variety of choices has been limited, although it is possible to exploit the technology differently, to apply command languages with more or less complicated structure, and so on. The distinction between instrumental and communicative actions and operations is important not only for the purposes of the design activities, but also for the product of design. A return to the distinction between whether the method primarily focuses on practice in use or on breakdown knowledge also leads to the distinction between whether the method when applied will lead designers to start from the intentional aspects of the future artifact or from the operational aspects. Flexibility, simplicity, and consistency are concepts that can characterize the aspects of the user interface. Within psychology, there is a long tradition of investigating and evaluating the performance of human tasks, especially where a computer is involved.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Traditional user interface design has been bound to conventional technology. The variety of choices has been limited, although it is possible to exploit the technology differently, to apply command languages with more or less complicated structure, and so on. The distinction between instrumental and communicative actions and operations is important not only for the purposes of the design activities, but also for the product of design. A return to the distinction between whether the method primarily focuses on practice in use or on breakdown knowledge also leads to the distinction between whether the method when applied will lead designers to start from the intentional aspects of the future artifact or from the operational aspects. Flexibility, simplicity, and consistency are concepts that can characterize the aspects of the user interface. Within psychology, there is a long tradition of investigating and evaluating the performance of human tasks, especially where a computer is involved.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Traditional user interface design has been bound to conventional technology. The variety of choices has been limited, although it is possible to exploit the technology differently, to apply command languages with more or less complicated structure, and so on. The distinction between instrumental and communicative actions and operations is important not only for the purposes of the design activities, but also for the product of design. A return to the distinction between whether the method primarily focuses on practice in use or on breakdown knowledge also leads to the distinction between whether the method when applied will lead designers to start from the intentional aspects of the future artifact or from the operational aspects. Flexibility, simplicity, and consistency are concepts that can characterize the aspects of the user interface. Within psychology, there is a long tradition of investigating and evaluating the performance of human tasks, especially where a computer is involved.

Key concepts: Interface (matter), Computer science, Human–computer interaction, Interface design, Operating system, Maximum bubble pressure method, Bubble

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Methods for User Interface Design — Research Paper | ScholarLens