2018Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary)Open access

The Sphinx of American Education: Ralph Tyler's Peculiar Relationship with Standardized Testing

James E. Schul

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Standardized testing currently dominates the American educational landscape. Federal and state policy makers use standardized tests as the primary means to evaluate school performance, resulting in schools narrowing their curriculum toward experiences specifically aimed toward improving test scores. Ralph Tyler, the renowned evaluation expert from the twentieth century, had much to say about how standardized tests should be used, with warnings about the detrimental effects that ill-advised use of these tests can have on the school experience. Yet, his advice on tests garner little attention by policy makers and the public writ large. In this article, I examine Tyler's advice about how tests should be used in the school experience and then explore how Tyler's Rationale for educational evaluation may actually be linked to the contemporary paradigm that embraces high stakes testing. Although Tyler's Rationale never endorsed high stakes assessments, policy makers and educational evaluators alike, in the wake of the contemporary standards and accountability movement and the spirit of social efficiency, use the linearity of Tyler's Rationale for educational evaluation to justify the wide and farreaching use of standardized testing. These policy makers, I discuss, should strongly consider Tyler's warnings about the misuse of standardized testing in the evaluation of a school curriculum.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Standardized testing currently dominates the American educational landscape. Federal and state policy makers use standardized tests as the primary means to evaluate school performance, resulting in schools narrowing their curriculum toward experiences specifically aimed toward improving test scores. Ralph Tyler, the renowned evaluation expert from the twentieth century, had much to say about how standardized tests should be used, with warnings about the detrimental effects that ill-advised use of these tests can have on the school experience. Yet, his advice on tests garner little attention by policy makers and the public writ large. In this article, I examine Tyler's advice about how tests should be used in the school experience and then explore how Tyler's Rationale for educational evaluation may actually be linked to the contemporary paradigm that embraces high stakes testing. Although Tyler's Rationale never endorsed high stakes assessments, policy makers and educational evaluators alike, in the wake of the contemporary standards and accountability movement and the spirit of social efficiency, use the linearity of Tyler's Rationale for educational evaluation to justify the wide and farreaching use of standardized testing. These policy makers, I discuss, should strongly consider Tyler's warnings about the misuse of standardized testing in the evaluation of a school curriculum.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Standardized testing currently dominates the American educational landscape. Federal and state policy makers use standardized tests as the primary means to evaluate school performance, resulting in schools narrowing their curriculum toward experiences specifically aimed toward improving test scores. Ralph Tyler, the renowned evaluation expert from the twentieth century, had much to say about how standardized tests should be used, with warnings about the detrimental effects that ill-advised use of these tests can have on the school experience. Yet, his advice on tests garner little attention by policy makers and the public writ large. In this article, I examine Tyler's advice about how tests should be used in the school experience and then explore how Tyler's Rationale for educational evaluation may actually be linked to the contemporary paradigm that embraces high stakes testing. Although Tyler's Rationale never endorsed high stakes assessments, policy makers and educational evaluators alike, in the wake of the contemporary standards and accountability movement and the spirit of social efficiency, use the linearity of Tyler's Rationale for educational evaluation to justify the wide and farreaching use of standardized testing. These policy makers, I discuss, should strongly consider Tyler's warnings about the misuse of standardized testing in the evaluation of a school curriculum.

Key concepts: Standardized test, Writ, Accountability, Curriculum, Educational assessment, Academic standards, Test (biology), Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Sphinx of American Education: Ralph Tyler's Peculiar Relationship with Standardized Testing — Research Paper | ScholarLens