URBAN-ORIENTED INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNITED STATES TERRITORIES
V. N. Minat
Abstract
Open-access reader
V. N. Minat
Abstract
Open-access reader
The spatial nature of innovation activity in the modern USA is determined by the urban orientation of the territorial forms of this activity and depends on the complex impact of both regional factors and effects arising in transregional systems, which are defined by the author as innovative systems of agglomerations in United States and are the central object of this study. Comprehensive comparative analysis of territorial differences in terms of indicators and integrated index of regional development of the United States innovation systems and innovation systems of agglomerations within the country’s metropolitan statistical areas in 2001—2020 revealed the spatial heterogeneity of centre-peripheral innovation. The impact of the factors that caused the innovative development of the territories of the United States, based on the universal influence of three effects of urban-oriented placement of elements and processes of innovation activity, the most important of which are, respectively, innovative companies and the associated flow of knowledge and technologies, is empirically confirmed.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The spatial nature of innovation activity in the modern USA is determined by the urban orientation of the territorial forms of this activity and depends on the complex impact of both regional factors and effects arising in transregional systems, which are defined by the author as innovative systems of agglomerations in United States and are the central object of this study. Comprehensive comparative analysis of territorial differences in terms of indicators and integrated index of regional development of the United States innovation systems and innovation systems of agglomerations within the country’s metropolitan statistical areas in 2001—2020 revealed the spatial heterogeneity of centre-peripheral innovation. The impact of the factors that caused the innovative development of the territories of the United States, based on the universal influence of three effects of urban-oriented placement of elements and processes of innovation activity, the most important of which are, respectively, innovative companies and the associated flow of knowledge and technologies, is empirically confirmed.
Key concepts: Environmental planning, Urban planning, Geography, Regional science, Engineering, Civil engineering