2019食品工业科技Requires access

Comparison Analysis of Volatile Components in Two Kinds of Rattan Pepper Oil Produced from Different Processing

Hu Qiang, Yanyun Wang, Yan Wang, Liao Huazhen, Han Zhuo-tao

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The volatile components of two kinds of rattan pepper oil produced from different processing was analyzed by HS-GC-MS (headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry). The volatile components were qualitatively analyzed by matching the mass spectral database NIST14 and were quantified by peak area normalization. The results were as follows:33 volatile components were identified from the two rattan pepper oils by traditional oil immersion method and supercritical CO2 extraction method. 16 components in total existed in both the two oils, of which 4 components (D-limonene, linalool, sabinene and myrcene) were the main parts (relative content ≥ 4.5%). There were 6 kinds of volatile components (β-elemene, 1-caryophyllene, germacrene D, humulene, octyl aldehyde and decanal) peculiar to traditional oil immersion method, and 11 kinds of volatile components (3-methyl-2-butenonitrile, 5-cyanol-1-pentene, (1S)-(1) -β-Pinene, alpha-terpinene, trans-β.-Ocimene, 3, 3-dimethylcyclohexanol, 4-terpinenyl acetate, methyl phenylacetate, 2, 4-Hexadienal, (E, E) -, (+) -citronellal and 1-methyl-isohexanoic acid) peculiar to supercritical CO2extraction. Alkenes and alcohols were main volatile components in the two kinds of oil, but the relative contents were different. The latter oil contained traces of acid compounds (1-methyl-isohexanoic acid). The results above provided theoretical basis for both processing and quality improvement of rattan pepper oil.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The volatile components of two kinds of rattan pepper oil produced from different processing was analyzed by HS-GC-MS (headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry). The volatile components were qualitatively analyzed by matching the mass spectral database NIST14 and were quantified by peak area normalization. The results were as follows:33 volatile components were identified from the two rattan pepper oils by traditional oil immersion method and supercritical CO2 extraction method. 16 components in total existed in both the two oils, of which 4 components (D-limonene, linalool, sabinene and myrcene) were the main parts (relative content ≥ 4.5%). There were 6 kinds of volatile components (β-elemene, 1-caryophyllene, germacrene D, humulene, octyl aldehyde and decanal) peculiar to traditional oil immersion method, and 11 kinds of volatile components (3-methyl-2-butenonitrile, 5-cyanol-1-pentene, (1S)-(1) -β-Pinene, alpha-terpinene, trans-β.-Ocimene, 3, 3-dimethylcyclohexanol, 4-terpinenyl acetate, methyl phenylacetate, 2, 4-Hexadienal, (E, E) -, (+) -citronellal and 1-methyl-isohexanoic acid) peculiar to supercritical CO2extraction. Alkenes and alcohols were main volatile components in the two kinds of oil, but the relative contents were different. The latter oil contained traces of acid compounds (1-methyl-isohexanoic acid). The results above provided theoretical basis for both processing and quality improvement of rattan pepper oil.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The volatile components of two kinds of rattan pepper oil produced from different processing was analyzed by HS-GC-MS (headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry). The volatile components were qualitatively analyzed by matching the mass spectral database NIST14 and were quantified by peak area normalization. The results were as follows:33 volatile components were identified from the two rattan pepper oils by traditional oil immersion method and supercritical CO2 extraction method. 16 components in total existed in both the two oils, of which 4 components (D-limonene, linalool, sabinene and myrcene) were the main parts (relative content ≥ 4.5%). There were 6 kinds of volatile components (β-elemene, 1-caryophyllene, germacrene D, humulene, octyl aldehyde and decanal) peculiar to traditional oil immersion method, and 11 kinds of volatile components (3-methyl-2-butenonitrile, 5-cyanol-1-pentene, (1S)-(1) -β-Pinene, alpha-terpinene, trans-β.-Ocimene, 3, 3-dimethylcyclohexanol, 4-terpinenyl acetate, methyl phenylacetate, 2, 4-Hexadienal, (E, E) -, (+) -citronellal and 1-methyl-isohexanoic acid) peculiar to supercritical CO2extraction. Alkenes and alcohols were main volatile components in the two kinds of oil, but the relative contents were different. The latter oil contained traces of acid compounds (1-methyl-isohexanoic acid). The results above provided theoretical basis for both processing and quality improvement of rattan pepper oil.

Key concepts: Chemistry, Decanal, Sabinene, Chromatography, Steam distillation, Pepper, Limonene, Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison Analysis of Volatile Components in Two Kinds of Rattan Pepper Oil Produced from Different Processing — Research Paper | ScholarLens