An update on cefepime and its future role in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitors for MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa–—authors’ response
Burcu Isler, Patrick N. A. Harris, Adam G. Stewart, David L. Paterson
Abstract
Burcu Isler, Patrick N. A. Harris, Adam G. Stewart, David L. Paterson
Abstract
We thank Nicolau et al.1 for their highly insightful comments on our paper.2 We agree that cefepime/zidebactam differs from classical β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and that cefepime/zidebactam likely does have potential utility against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. In vivo data generated in the studies by Monogue et al.3 and Kidd et al.4 are promising and support the ongoing efforts for testing cefepime/zidebactam efficacy in clinical studies. Although most P. aeruginosa isolates with elevated cefepime/zidebactam MICs were inhibited by human-simulated regimens of cefepime/zidebactam in those animal studies, clinical efficacy of cefepime/zidebactam against human infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa isolates with cefepime/zidebactam MICs greater than that of cefepime would be best determined in randomized controlled clinical trials. We also thank Nicolau et al.1 for noticing that three references5–7 describing cefepime/zidebactam activity against Acinetobacter baumannii were mistakenly used in our paper. Finally, we...
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We thank Nicolau et al.1 for their highly insightful comments on our paper.2 We agree that cefepime/zidebactam differs from classical β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and that cefepime/zidebactam likely does have potential utility against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. In vivo data generated in the studies by Monogue et al.3 and Kidd et al.4 are promising and support the ongoing efforts for testing cefepime/zidebactam efficacy in clinical studies. Although most P. aeruginosa isolates with elevated cefepime/zidebactam MICs were inhibited by human-simulated regimens of cefepime/zidebactam in those animal studies, clinical efficacy of cefepime/zidebactam against human infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa isolates with cefepime/zidebactam MICs greater than that of cefepime would be best determined in randomized controlled clinical trials. We also thank Nicolau et al.1 for noticing that three references5–7 describing cefepime/zidebactam activity against Acinetobacter baumannii were mistakenly used in our paper. Finally, we...
Key concepts: Cefepime, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Microbiology, Cephalosporin, Medicine, Biology, Antibiotics