The Last Generation or the First Enhanced-Potency Broad Spectrum Cephalosporin?
Christine C. Sanders, Ellen Smith Moland
Abstract
Christine C. Sanders, Ellen Smith Moland
Abstract
Summary Cefepime and 8 other ~-lactam antibiotics were compared with regard to in vitro activity against 134 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria resistant to ~-lactam antibiotics by a variety of mechanisms. Overall, cefepime was the most active cephalosporin tested, inhibiting 104 of 112 (93%) strains of Enterobacteriaceae and 12 of 22 (55%) strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at concentrations of 8 mg/L or less. In contrast, ceftazidime inhibited only 64 (57%) of the Enterobacteriaceae and 11 (50%) of the P. aeruginosa strains . Imipenem was the most active ~-Iactam agent tested, although some strains resistant to the carbapenem were susceptible to cefepime. Cefepime was less likely than ceftazidime to select mutants from organisms possessing inducible Bush Group I ~-lactamases. Of 19 mutants selected by various cephalosporins, 18 (95%) re mained susceptible to cefepime, whereas only 6 (32%) were susceptible to ceftazidime. These findings suggest that cefepime possesses enhanced activity compared with other cephalosporins, and this may result from its improved penetration into the Gram-negative cell and the lower affinity of ~-lactamases for the drug.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Summary Cefepime and 8 other ~-lactam antibiotics were compared with regard to in vitro activity against 134 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria resistant to ~-lactam antibiotics by a variety of mechanisms. Overall, cefepime was the most active cephalosporin tested, inhibiting 104 of 112 (93%) strains of Enterobacteriaceae and 12 of 22 (55%) strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at concentrations of 8 mg/L or less. In contrast, ceftazidime inhibited only 64 (57%) of the Enterobacteriaceae and 11 (50%) of the P. aeruginosa strains . Imipenem was the most active ~-Iactam agent tested, although some strains resistant to the carbapenem were susceptible to cefepime. Cefepime was less likely than ceftazidime to select mutants from organisms possessing inducible Bush Group I ~-lactamases. Of 19 mutants selected by various cephalosporins, 18 (95%) re mained susceptible to cefepime, whereas only 6 (32%) were susceptible to ceftazidime. These findings suggest that cefepime possesses enhanced activity compared with other cephalosporins, and this may result from its improved penetration into the Gram-negative cell and the lower affinity of ~-lactamases for the drug.
Key concepts: Cefepime, Cephalosporin, Ceftazidime, Microbiology, Imipenem, Antibiotics, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa