2018International journal of research in social sciencesRequires access

The Zambian continuous disclosure legal regime—adequate to ensure efficient disclosure?

Lennox Trivedi Samamba

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Continuous disclosure of price-sensitive information, serves to ensure accuracy in the price of the securities of an issuer and credit ratings of those securities and the issuer, transparency and fair-play in securities markets, and as such, critical to investor confidence and the overall integrity of the market. The study assesses the legal framework for public distribution of securities locally and across international borders so as to establish whether or not it has provided adequate incentives for efficient continuous disclosure of material information which is not generally available by listed issuers at minimum cost. The study employs the doctrinal approach to evaluating legal rules. The main findings of the study were that (a)the law does not impose a stream-lined continuous disclosure obligation on listed issuers (b) the law does not exempt listed issuers from continuous disclosure of (i) generally-available material information, (ii) confidential information, and (iii) detrimental information, (c) the law does not provide for mutual recognition of continuous disclosure documents approved in home country of the issuer, (d)the law does not provide for civil remedies or compensation for loss occasioned by breach the continuous disclosure obligation. The article makes necessary recommendations for law reform as a possible way of remedying these shortcomings in the law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Continuous disclosure of price-sensitive information, serves to ensure accuracy in the price of the securities of an issuer and credit ratings of those securities and the issuer, transparency and fair-play in securities markets, and as such, critical to investor confidence and the overall integrity of the market. The study assesses the legal framework for public distribution of securities locally and across international borders so as to establish whether or not it has provided adequate incentives for efficient continuous disclosure of material information which is not generally available by listed issuers at minimum cost. The study employs the doctrinal approach to evaluating legal rules. The main findings of the study were that (a)the law does not impose a stream-lined continuous disclosure obligation on listed issuers (b) the law does not exempt listed issuers from continuous disclosure of (i) generally-available material information, (ii) confidential information, and (iii) detrimental information, (c) the law does not provide for mutual recognition of continuous disclosure documents approved in home country of the issuer, (d)the law does not provide for civil remedies or compensation for loss occasioned by breach the continuous disclosure obligation. The article makes necessary recommendations for law reform as a possible way of remedying these shortcomings in the law.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Continuous disclosure of price-sensitive information, serves to ensure accuracy in the price of the securities of an issuer and credit ratings of those securities and the issuer, transparency and fair-play in securities markets, and as such, critical to investor confidence and the overall integrity of the market. The study assesses the legal framework for public distribution of securities locally and across international borders so as to establish whether or not it has provided adequate incentives for efficient continuous disclosure of material information which is not generally available by listed issuers at minimum cost. The study employs the doctrinal approach to evaluating legal rules. The main findings of the study were that (a)the law does not impose a stream-lined continuous disclosure obligation on listed issuers (b) the law does not exempt listed issuers from continuous disclosure of (i) generally-available material information, (ii) confidential information, and (iii) detrimental information, (c) the law does not provide for mutual recognition of continuous disclosure documents approved in home country of the issuer, (d)the law does not provide for civil remedies or compensation for loss occasioned by breach the continuous disclosure obligation. The article makes necessary recommendations for law reform as a possible way of remedying these shortcomings in the law.

Key concepts: Issuer, Obligation, Business, Transparency (behavior), Accounting, Audit, Law, Actuarial science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Zambian continuous disclosure legal regime—adequate to ensure efficient disclosure? — Research Paper | ScholarLens