2010SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

The Case for a Single-Document-Driven European Issuer-Disclosure Regime

Gaëtane Schaeken Willemaers

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The disclosure regime to which corporate equity issuers listed on European regulated markets are subject under the relevant European financial regulation have similar objectives whether or not the issuer is offering securities at the time of disclosure. From this premise, this article argues that the content and format of disclosure should be the same on primary and secondary markets, at least with respect to large and thickly traded issuers whose securities are traded in an efficient market. More specifically, a move to an integrated disclosure regime and to a company registration system is advocated. This includes the suppression of the separate drafting, dissemination and storage of periodic reports which should be replaced by a periodic update of the initial disclosure document. The suggested scheme should lower the costs for issuers and supervisory authorities. It should also make comparisons by investors easier.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The disclosure regime to which corporate equity issuers listed on European regulated markets are subject under the relevant European financial regulation have similar objectives whether or not the issuer is offering securities at the time of disclosure. From this premise, this article argues that the content and format of disclosure should be the same on primary and secondary markets, at least with respect to large and thickly traded issuers whose securities are traded in an efficient market. More specifically, a move to an integrated disclosure regime and to a company registration system is advocated. This includes the suppression of the separate drafting, dissemination and storage of periodic reports which should be replaced by a periodic update of the initial disclosure document. The suggested scheme should lower the costs for issuers and supervisory authorities. It should also make comparisons by investors easier.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The disclosure regime to which corporate equity issuers listed on European regulated markets are subject under the relevant European financial regulation have similar objectives whether or not the issuer is offering securities at the time of disclosure. From this premise, this article argues that the content and format of disclosure should be the same on primary and secondary markets, at least with respect to large and thickly traded issuers whose securities are traded in an efficient market. More specifically, a move to an integrated disclosure regime and to a company registration system is advocated. This includes the suppression of the separate drafting, dissemination and storage of periodic reports which should be replaced by a periodic update of the initial disclosure document. The suggested scheme should lower the costs for issuers and supervisory authorities. It should also make comparisons by investors easier.

Key concepts: Issuer, Business, Premise, Equity (law), Accounting, Hybrid security, Monetary economics, Investment banking

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Case for a Single-Document-Driven European Issuer-Disclosure Regime — Research Paper | ScholarLens