Analytic Framework of Institutional Support for Student Assessment.
Marvin W. Peterson, Marne K. Einarson
Abstract
Marvin W. Peterson, Marne K. Einarson
Abstract
From the perspective of scholars and practitioners, an effective student assessment approach gathers information about selected aspects of students ’ characteristics, experiences, and achievements and uses this information to shape institutional policies, processes, and practices in ways that lead to improved student performance and institutional functioning (American Association for Higher Education [AAHE], 1992; Banta & Associates, 1993; Ewell, 1984, 1988b). Since the emergence of the student assessment movement in higher education more than a decade ago, the number of institutions engaged in some form of student assessment activity has steadily increased (El-Khawas, 1988, 1990, 1995). Institutions have differed markedly in their approaches to student assessment (Banta et al., 1996) but few have undertaken comprehensive student assessment programs (El-Khawas, 1990; Hexter & Lippincott, 1990; Johnson, Prus, Andersen, & El-Khawas, 1991). Moreover, concerns have been raised that student assessment efforts often fail to produce discernible impacts on students ’ or institutions ’ performance
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
From the perspective of scholars and practitioners, an effective student assessment approach gathers information about selected aspects of students ’ characteristics, experiences, and achievements and uses this information to shape institutional policies, processes, and practices in ways that lead to improved student performance and institutional functioning (American Association for Higher Education [AAHE], 1992; Banta & Associates, 1993; Ewell, 1984, 1988b). Since the emergence of the student assessment movement in higher education more than a decade ago, the number of institutions engaged in some form of student assessment activity has steadily increased (El-Khawas, 1988, 1990, 1995). Institutions have differed markedly in their approaches to student assessment (Banta et al., 1996) but few have undertaken comprehensive student assessment programs (El-Khawas, 1990; Hexter & Lippincott, 1990; Johnson, Prus, Andersen, & El-Khawas, 1991). Moreover, concerns have been raised that student assessment efforts often fail to produce discernible impacts on students ’ or institutions ’ performance
Key concepts: Computer science, Mathematics education, Psychology