2020Alatoo Academic StudiesRequires access

SOME PROBLEMS OF LEGISLATIVE REGULATION OF THE PROCEDURAL STATUS OF A SUSPECT

Guzel Kamil kyzy

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article discusses issues related to the regulation of the procedural status of a suspect in the new Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic, as well as analyzes the methods of obtaining evidence. Testimony of a suspect can be considered in two aspects: in the first aspect, the testimony of a suspect is presented as a source of evidence, in the second aspect, the testimony of a suspect is recognized as a means of protection against criminal prosecution. Also we pay attention to criteria for evaluating a testimony of a suspect. As any other source of evidence, the testimony of a suspect, according to the author of the article, should be checked by comparing with other types of evidence, as well as assessed by the authorities conducting the proceedings in terms of the relevance, admissibility and reliability of the obtained information during questioning and other investigative actions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article discusses issues related to the regulation of the procedural status of a suspect in the new Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic, as well as analyzes the methods of obtaining evidence. Testimony of a suspect can be considered in two aspects: in the first aspect, the testimony of a suspect is presented as a source of evidence, in the second aspect, the testimony of a suspect is recognized as a means of protection against criminal prosecution. Also we pay attention to criteria for evaluating a testimony of a suspect. As any other source of evidence, the testimony of a suspect, according to the author of the article, should be checked by comparing with other types of evidence, as well as assessed by the authorities conducting the proceedings in terms of the relevance, admissibility and reliability of the obtained information during questioning and other investigative actions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article discusses issues related to the regulation of the procedural status of a suspect in the new Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic, as well as analyzes the methods of obtaining evidence. Testimony of a suspect can be considered in two aspects: in the first aspect, the testimony of a suspect is presented as a source of evidence, in the second aspect, the testimony of a suspect is recognized as a means of protection against criminal prosecution. Also we pay attention to criteria for evaluating a testimony of a suspect. As any other source of evidence, the testimony of a suspect, according to the author of the article, should be checked by comparing with other types of evidence, as well as assessed by the authorities conducting the proceedings in terms of the relevance, admissibility and reliability of the obtained information during questioning and other investigative actions.

Key concepts: Suspect, Relevance (law), Legislature, Political science, Criminal procedure, Psychology, Law, Code (set theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SOME PROBLEMS OF LEGISLATIVE REGULATION OF THE PROCEDURAL STATUS OF A SUSPECT — Research Paper | ScholarLens