Comparison of FCC Gasoline Hydrogenation Units for Upgrading of China V Standard Diesel
Li Zhang
Abstract
Li Zhang
Abstract
In this paper,two upgrading gasoline hydrogenation units were compared,which are company A’ s 500,000 ton/year gasoline hydrotreating unit and company B ’ s 500,000 ton/year gasoline hydrotreating unit.The process settings,operating conditions,operating performance,product quality and energy consumption were studied and compared.The results showed that the investment and energy consumption of company A are relatively high,but the operating flexibility and stability of device are conducive to the adjustment of product quality.The investment and energy consumption of company B are relatively low,but the operating flexibility of the device is poor.This is because that the three reactors of the reaction part utilize a single heat source as heat supply.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this paper,two upgrading gasoline hydrogenation units were compared,which are company A’ s 500,000 ton/year gasoline hydrotreating unit and company B ’ s 500,000 ton/year gasoline hydrotreating unit.The process settings,operating conditions,operating performance,product quality and energy consumption were studied and compared.The results showed that the investment and energy consumption of company A are relatively high,but the operating flexibility and stability of device are conducive to the adjustment of product quality.The investment and energy consumption of company B are relatively low,but the operating flexibility of the device is poor.This is because that the three reactors of the reaction part utilize a single heat source as heat supply.
Key concepts: Gasoline, Hydrodesulfurization, Diesel fuel, Operating cost, Flexibility (engineering), Investment (military), Waste management, Energy consumption