1978•Unpublished venueRequires access

Army Training Study: Final Report Summary.

Frederic Joseph Brown

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : The Army Training Study conducted a comprehensive review of Army training, its research encompassing a wide range of training issues for a broad perspective. The study group developed a conceptual training system, the ARTS Model, to describe what Army training is, ought to be, and should do and to define the objectives of training. It conducted field surveys and other data collection at numerous continental US Army posts and schools. The data obtained was analyzed using the Training Effectiveness Analysis (TEA) in order to determine the state of Army training. It also developed the Battalion Training Model (BTM), a computer-modeled analysis tool used to analyze training resources available and to predict training levels attainable with those resources. The report summary provides an overview of the guidance received by the study group, its observations of Army training and its recommendations for improvement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : The Army Training Study conducted a comprehensive review of Army training, its research encompassing a wide range of training issues for a broad perspective. The study group developed a conceptual training system, the ARTS Model, to describe what Army training is, ought to be, and should do and to define the objectives of training. It conducted field surveys and other data collection at numerous continental US Army posts and schools. The data obtained was analyzed using the Training Effectiveness Analysis (TEA) in order to determine the state of Army training. It also developed the Battalion Training Model (BTM), a computer-modeled analysis tool used to analyze training resources available and to predict training levels attainable with those resources. The report summary provides an overview of the guidance received by the study group, its observations of Army training and its recommendations for improvement.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : The Army Training Study conducted a comprehensive review of Army training, its research encompassing a wide range of training issues for a broad perspective. The study group developed a conceptual training system, the ARTS Model, to describe what Army training is, ought to be, and should do and to define the objectives of training. It conducted field surveys and other data collection at numerous continental US Army posts and schools. The data obtained was analyzed using the Training Effectiveness Analysis (TEA) in order to determine the state of Army training. It also developed the Battalion Training Model (BTM), a computer-modeled analysis tool used to analyze training resources available and to predict training levels attainable with those resources. The report summary provides an overview of the guidance received by the study group, its observations of Army training and its recommendations for improvement.

Key concepts: Training (meteorology), Field training, Perspective (graphical), Operations research, Medical education, Engineering, Computer science, Operations management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Army Training Study: Final Report Summary. — Research Paper | ScholarLens