2010•Ginekologia i Położnictwo medical projectRequires access

Delivery in women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM)

Lidia Biesiada, Zbigniew Pietrzak, Marek Jacaszek, Jacek B Aszczyk, Grzegorz Krasomski

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction. Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and amniotic fluid outflow indicates discontinuation of physiological bariers protecting the foetus against harmful environmental factors. PROM ethiology remains unexplained, it is considered that the main risk factor is going through premature delivery in the past, especially preceded by PROM, or delivery loss due to miscarriages. The aim. The aim of the article was to present complications and outcome of deliveries in the group of women with PROM. Materials and Methods. A group of 62 women with PROM, was compared to a group of 100 women with preserved membranes. Results. A mean age in both groups was similar (27,1 and 26,4 year), the most of the women were nulliparas. The percentage of preterm deliveries was higher in the PROM group (35,5% versus 24%) and the average time of pregnancy was shorter (35,8 vs 38,4 weeks). The frequency of pregnancy lost in the past was similar in both groups, so as a percentage of IUGR, GDM and placenta praevia. PIH was more common in the control group, but threatening preterm delivery and intrauterine infection in the PROM group. Beginning a delivery 64,5% of women with PROM had unprepared cervix (<6 in Bishop score) . The percentage of induction of delivery according to intrauterine infection was higher, so as a percentage of caesarean sections (48,4% versus 38%), the most common reason for them were fetal asphyxia and insufficient progress of delivery. The mean time of the first stage of delivery was similar in the both group, but the second stage was twice shorter in the PROM group and the newborns’ weight lower. There were no differences between the average newborns’ condition in 1 minute Apgar score. Conclusion. Intrauterine infection is the most dangerous complication connected with PROM. Women with prom have more often unprepared cervix when a delivery begins, induction of delivery due to the intrauterine infection is performed more often and a higher percentage of caesarean sections is observed in this group

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction. Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and amniotic fluid outflow indicates discontinuation of physiological bariers protecting the foetus against harmful environmental factors. PROM ethiology remains unexplained, it is considered that the main risk factor is going through premature delivery in the past, especially preceded by PROM, or delivery loss due to miscarriages. The aim. The aim of the article was to present complications and outcome of deliveries in the group of women with PROM. Materials and Methods. A group of 62 women with PROM, was compared to a group of 100 women with preserved membranes. Results. A mean age in both groups was similar (27,1 and 26,4 year), the most of the women were nulliparas. The percentage of preterm deliveries was higher in the PROM group (35,5% versus 24%) and the average time of pregnancy was shorter (35,8 vs 38,4 weeks). The frequency of pregnancy lost in the past was similar in both groups, so as a percentage of IUGR, GDM and placenta praevia. PIH was more common in the control group, but threatening preterm delivery and intrauterine infection in the PROM group. Beginning a delivery 64,5% of women with PROM had unprepared cervix (<6 in Bishop score) . The percentage of induction of delivery according to intrauterine infection was higher, so as a percentage of caesarean sections (48,4% versus 38%), the most common reason for them were fetal asphyxia and insufficient progress of delivery. The mean time of the first stage of delivery was similar in the both group, but the second stage was twice shorter in the PROM group and the newborns’ weight lower. There were no differences between the average newborns’ condition in 1 minute Apgar score. Conclusion. Intrauterine infection is the most dangerous complication connected with PROM. Women with prom have more often unprepared cervix when a delivery begins, induction of delivery due to the intrauterine infection is performed more often and a higher percentage of caesarean sections is observed in this group

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction. Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and amniotic fluid outflow indicates discontinuation of physiological bariers protecting the foetus against harmful environmental factors. PROM ethiology remains unexplained, it is considered that the main risk factor is going through premature delivery in the past, especially preceded by PROM, or delivery loss due to miscarriages. The aim. The aim of the article was to present complications and outcome of deliveries in the group of women with PROM. Materials and Methods. A group of 62 women with PROM, was compared to a group of 100 women with preserved membranes. Results. A mean age in both groups was similar (27,1 and 26,4 year), the most of the women were nulliparas. The percentage of preterm deliveries was higher in the PROM group (35,5% versus 24%) and the average time of pregnancy was shorter (35,8 vs 38,4 weeks). The frequency of pregnancy lost in the past was similar in both groups, so as a percentage of IUGR, GDM and placenta praevia. PIH was more common in the control group, but threatening preterm delivery and intrauterine infection in the PROM group. Beginning a delivery 64,5% of women with PROM had unprepared cervix (<6 in Bishop score) . The percentage of induction of delivery according to intrauterine infection was higher, so as a percentage of caesarean sections (48,4% versus 38%), the most common reason for them were fetal asphyxia and insufficient progress of delivery. The mean time of the first stage of delivery was similar in the both group, but the second stage was twice shorter in the PROM group and the newborns’ weight lower. There were no differences between the average newborns’ condition in 1 minute Apgar score. Conclusion. Intrauterine infection is the most dangerous complication connected with PROM. Women with prom have more often unprepared cervix when a delivery begins, induction of delivery due to the intrauterine infection is performed more often and a higher percentage of caesarean sections is observed in this group

Key concepts: Prom, Medicine, Obstetrics, Premature rupture of membranes, Pregnancy, Discontinuation, Gynecology, Rupture of membranes

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Delivery in women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) — Research Paper | ScholarLens