2016SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Markets Need Not Be Perfect: Competition Policy and Market Structure Analysis in the Global South

Dina I. Waked

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This article explores alternatives to the proscribed ideal of perfect competition and allocative efficiency that are more suitable to countries in the Global South. Seeking perfect competition in order to realize allocative efficiency is not only an unsuitable guide for competition enforcement in countries in the Global South, but it also leads to an undesirable competition policy. An alternative competition policy seeking dynamic efficiency, innovation and growth is proposed to replace the static ideal of allocative efficiency. Under this proposed alternative the ideal market structure, necessary to realize these goals, is no longer confined to perfect competition, but is one that strikes a balance between competition and concentration. Under this alternative, the concentrated enterprises are considered beneficial for society as they can innovate, spend on R&D, and in the long run can reduce their cost functions to allow for even lower prices than those prevailing in perfectly competitive markets. This proposal relies on a redistributive mechanism that is integral to the pursuit and realization of this alternative policy and market structure. With redistribution pursed within the implementation of this alternative, the background rules of competition law are thereby changed. Support for this proposed alternative, where competition policy and market structure analysis deviate from the dominant discourse, is drawn from historical evidence, empirical studies and progressive economic thought.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article explores alternatives to the proscribed ideal of perfect competition and allocative efficiency that are more suitable to countries in the Global South. Seeking perfect competition in order to realize allocative efficiency is not only an unsuitable guide for competition enforcement in countries in the Global South, but it also leads to an undesirable competition policy. An alternative competition policy seeking dynamic efficiency, innovation and growth is proposed to replace the static ideal of allocative efficiency. Under this proposed alternative the ideal market structure, necessary to realize these goals, is no longer confined to perfect competition, but is one that strikes a balance between competition and concentration. Under this alternative, the concentrated enterprises are considered beneficial for society as they can innovate, spend on R&D, and in the long run can reduce their cost functions to allow for even lower prices than those prevailing in perfectly competitive markets. This proposal relies on a redistributive mechanism that is integral to the pursuit and realization of this alternative policy and market structure. With redistribution pursed within the implementation of this alternative, the background rules of competition law are thereby changed. Support for this proposed alternative, where competition policy and market structure analysis deviate from the dominant discourse, is drawn from historical evidence, empirical studies and progressive economic thought.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article explores alternatives to the proscribed ideal of perfect competition and allocative efficiency that are more suitable to countries in the Global South. Seeking perfect competition in order to realize allocative efficiency is not only an unsuitable guide for competition enforcement in countries in the Global South, but it also leads to an undesirable competition policy. An alternative competition policy seeking dynamic efficiency, innovation and growth is proposed to replace the static ideal of allocative efficiency. Under this proposed alternative the ideal market structure, necessary to realize these goals, is no longer confined to perfect competition, but is one that strikes a balance between competition and concentration. Under this alternative, the concentrated enterprises are considered beneficial for society as they can innovate, spend on R&D, and in the long run can reduce their cost functions to allow for even lower prices than those prevailing in perfectly competitive markets. This proposal relies on a redistributive mechanism that is integral to the pursuit and realization of this alternative policy and market structure. With redistribution pursed within the implementation of this alternative, the background rules of competition law are thereby changed. Support for this proposed alternative, where competition policy and market structure analysis deviate from the dominant discourse, is drawn from historical evidence, empirical studies and progressive economic thought.

Key concepts: Allocative efficiency, Economics, Competition (biology), Enforcement, Dynamic efficiency, Order (exchange), Perfect competition, Microeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Markets Need Not Be Perfect: Competition Policy and Market Structure Analysis in the Global South — Research Paper | ScholarLens