2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

Overview of Ferroelectric Memory Devices and Reliability Aware Design Optimization

Shan Zhi Deng, Zijian Zhao, Santosh K. Kurinec, Kai Ni, Yi Nong Xiao, Tongguang Yu, Vijaykrishnan Narayanan

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Since the discovery of CMOS-compatible and highly scalable ferroelectric HfO2, there has been a significant revival of interest in developing ferroelectric devices for high performance and energy-efficient embedded nonvolatile memories. Multiple ferroelectric memory devices are under investigation by harnessing the nonvolatile polarization states. These devices include the ferroelectric FET (FeFET), ferroelectric capacitor based random access memory (FeRAM), and ferroelectric tunnel junction (FTJ). Though the underlying memory storage mechanisms are the same in these devices, their memory sensing mechanisms are different. This difference leads to fundamentally different, and even opposite ferroelectric optimization directions. Given their different characteristics and individual advantages, it is likely that all these devices will co-exist to meet varying needs. Therefore, it is important to establish and compare the design guidelines for the three different ferroelectric memory devices. The design optimization will also be constrained by the reliability limit, which is critical to guarantee the success of the ferroelectric memory devices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the discovery of CMOS-compatible and highly scalable ferroelectric HfO2, there has been a significant revival of interest in developing ferroelectric devices for high performance and energy-efficient embedded nonvolatile memories. Multiple ferroelectric memory devices are under investigation by harnessing the nonvolatile polarization states. These devices include the ferroelectric FET (FeFET), ferroelectric capacitor based random access memory (FeRAM), and ferroelectric tunnel junction (FTJ). Though the underlying memory storage mechanisms are the same in these devices, their memory sensing mechanisms are different. This difference leads to fundamentally different, and even opposite ferroelectric optimization directions. Given their different characteristics and individual advantages, it is likely that all these devices will co-exist to meet varying needs. Therefore, it is important to establish and compare the design guidelines for the three different ferroelectric memory devices. The design optimization will also be constrained by the reliability limit, which is critical to guarantee the success of the ferroelectric memory devices.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the discovery of CMOS-compatible and highly scalable ferroelectric HfO2, there has been a significant revival of interest in developing ferroelectric devices for high performance and energy-efficient embedded nonvolatile memories. Multiple ferroelectric memory devices are under investigation by harnessing the nonvolatile polarization states. These devices include the ferroelectric FET (FeFET), ferroelectric capacitor based random access memory (FeRAM), and ferroelectric tunnel junction (FTJ). Though the underlying memory storage mechanisms are the same in these devices, their memory sensing mechanisms are different. This difference leads to fundamentally different, and even opposite ferroelectric optimization directions. Given their different characteristics and individual advantages, it is likely that all these devices will co-exist to meet varying needs. Therefore, it is important to establish and compare the design guidelines for the three different ferroelectric memory devices. The design optimization will also be constrained by the reliability limit, which is critical to guarantee the success of the ferroelectric memory devices.

Key concepts: Ferroelectric RAM, Ferroelectricity, Non-volatile memory, Ferroelectric capacitor, Reliability (semiconductor), Materials science, Capacitor, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Overview of Ferroelectric Memory Devices and Reliability Aware Design Optimization — Research Paper | ScholarLens