2019Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research InterchangeOpen access

Comparison Analysis of Chinese University MOOC(Massive Open Online Course) and K-MOOC(Korea Massive Open Online Course) from the Standpoint of Learners

Author information unavailable

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

This study compared the difference between Chinese University MOOC(Massive Open Online Courses) and K-MOOC(Korea Massive Open Online Course) based on the contents and classifications of the courses, the course service structures, and the evaluation methods from the standpoint of learners through literature survey and comparison analysis.The study findings revealed that the Chinese University MOOC provides variety contents to students, schools, and also companies; the classification of K-MOOC courses is done according to level of difficulty and language.Also, both the Chinese MOOC and K-MOOC course service structures platforms have no quizzes and multi-language subtitles within the videos.Furthermore, the study findings revealed that the evaluation methods have no standards and have very different difficulty level to finish a course.Basing on study findings, there is a need for adding various contents to K-MOOC, classifying courses clearly in Chinese University MOOC, adding multi-language subtitles and quizzes in course videos to both platforms.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study compared the difference between Chinese University MOOC(Massive Open Online Courses) and K-MOOC(Korea Massive Open Online Course) based on the contents and classifications of the courses, the course service structures, and the evaluation methods from the standpoint of learners through literature survey and comparison analysis.The study findings revealed that the Chinese University MOOC provides variety contents to students, schools, and also companies; the classification of K-MOOC courses is done according to level of difficulty and language.Also, both the Chinese MOOC and K-MOOC course service structures platforms have no quizzes and multi-language subtitles within the videos.Furthermore, the study findings revealed that the evaluation methods have no standards and have very different difficulty level to finish a course.Basing on study findings, there is a need for adding various contents to K-MOOC, classifying courses clearly in Chinese University MOOC, adding multi-language subtitles and quizzes in course videos to both platforms.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study compared the difference between Chinese University MOOC(Massive Open Online Courses) and K-MOOC(Korea Massive Open Online Course) based on the contents and classifications of the courses, the course service structures, and the evaluation methods from the standpoint of learners through literature survey and comparison analysis.The study findings revealed that the Chinese University MOOC provides variety contents to students, schools, and also companies; the classification of K-MOOC courses is done according to level of difficulty and language.Also, both the Chinese MOOC and K-MOOC course service structures platforms have no quizzes and multi-language subtitles within the videos.Furthermore, the study findings revealed that the evaluation methods have no standards and have very different difficulty level to finish a course.Basing on study findings, there is a need for adding various contents to K-MOOC, classifying courses clearly in Chinese University MOOC, adding multi-language subtitles and quizzes in course videos to both platforms.

Key concepts: Massive open online course, Course (navigation), Online course, Open university, Online learning, Mathematics education, Computer science, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison Analysis of Chinese University MOOC(Massive Open Online Course) and K-MOOC(Korea Massive Open Online Course) from the Standpoint of Learners — Research Paper | ScholarLens