2010SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo and the International Protection of Minorities

Björn Arp

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Very seldom has a judgment or advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) received so much media coverage as the recent Advisory Opinion on the Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo rendered on 22 July 2010 in response to a question posed by the General Assembly. The question had been forwarded on behalf of a request by Serbia and was phrased in the following way: “Is the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self‐Government of Kosovo in accordance with international law?” Although this question entails a number of very relevant issues of contemporary international law, the ICJ's Advisory Opinion might not enter into the judicial history of the Court for its answer to this question, but rather for what it did not say. In particular, the Court avoided the issue of the protection of national minorities. This article sheds light on this omission and the implications this may have on the practice of territories that strive to declare their independence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Very seldom has a judgment or advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) received so much media coverage as the recent Advisory Opinion on the Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo rendered on 22 July 2010 in response to a question posed by the General Assembly. The question had been forwarded on behalf of a request by Serbia and was phrased in the following way: “Is the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self‐Government of Kosovo in accordance with international law?” Although this question entails a number of very relevant issues of contemporary international law, the ICJ's Advisory Opinion might not enter into the judicial history of the Court for its answer to this question, but rather for what it did not say. In particular, the Court avoided the issue of the protection of national minorities. This article sheds light on this omission and the implications this may have on the practice of territories that strive to declare their independence.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Very seldom has a judgment or advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) received so much media coverage as the recent Advisory Opinion on the Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo rendered on 22 July 2010 in response to a question posed by the General Assembly. The question had been forwarded on behalf of a request by Serbia and was phrased in the following way: “Is the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self‐Government of Kosovo in accordance with international law?” Although this question entails a number of very relevant issues of contemporary international law, the ICJ's Advisory Opinion might not enter into the judicial history of the Court for its answer to this question, but rather for what it did not say. In particular, the Court avoided the issue of the protection of national minorities. This article sheds light on this omission and the implications this may have on the practice of territories that strive to declare their independence.

Key concepts: Advisory opinion, International court, Law, Declaration of independence, Independence (probability theory), Political science, International law, Declaration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo and the International Protection of Minorities — Research Paper | ScholarLens