2010JOURNAL OF LEGAL RESEARCHRequires access

Some Consideration on the “ICJ'S Kozovo Advisory Opinion”

Abdollah Abedini

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

International Court of Justice (The Court) rendered its advisory opinion on “ Accordance with International Law of Unilateral Declaratiof Independence in Respect of Kosovo” on 22 July 2010. Having issued opinion “Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons” and “Legal Consequences of the Construction of Wall in the Occupide Palestinian Territory” , It was a awaited that Kosovo Advisory Opinion would to be most remarkable consequences than formers. In its operative clause, the Court pointed out, by ten votes to four, “The declaration of oindependence of Kosovo adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law. ” This finding of the Court is lead to surprising of many international lawyers. For not only has came to challenge the question and presumption of General Assembly, but it has alarmed, despite of the Court's great role on keeping of international peace and security, to international legal order.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

International Court of Justice (The Court) rendered its advisory opinion on “ Accordance with International Law of Unilateral Declaratiof Independence in Respect of Kosovo” on 22 July 2010. Having issued opinion “Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons” and “Legal Consequences of the Construction of Wall in the Occupide Palestinian Territory” , It was a awaited that Kosovo Advisory Opinion would to be most remarkable consequences than formers. In its operative clause, the Court pointed out, by ten votes to four, “The declaration of oindependence of Kosovo adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law. ” This finding of the Court is lead to surprising of many international lawyers. For not only has came to challenge the question and presumption of General Assembly, but it has alarmed, despite of the Court's great role on keeping of international peace and security, to international legal order.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

International Court of Justice (The Court) rendered its advisory opinion on “ Accordance with International Law of Unilateral Declaratiof Independence in Respect of Kosovo” on 22 July 2010. Having issued opinion “Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons” and “Legal Consequences of the Construction of Wall in the Occupide Palestinian Territory” , It was a awaited that Kosovo Advisory Opinion would to be most remarkable consequences than formers. In its operative clause, the Court pointed out, by ten votes to four, “The declaration of oindependence of Kosovo adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law. ” This finding of the Court is lead to surprising of many international lawyers. For not only has came to challenge the question and presumption of General Assembly, but it has alarmed, despite of the Court's great role on keeping of international peace and security, to international legal order.

Key concepts: Advisory opinion, International court, Law, Political science, Principle of legality, Dissenting opinion, International law, Concurring opinion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Some Consideration on the “ICJ'S Kozovo Advisory Opinion” — Research Paper | ScholarLens