Some Consideration on the “ICJ'S Kozovo Advisory Opinion”
Abdollah Abedini
Abstract
Abdollah Abedini
Abstract
International Court of Justice (The Court) rendered its advisory opinion on “ Accordance with International Law of Unilateral Declaratiof Independence in Respect of Kosovo” on 22 July 2010. Having issued opinion “Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons” and “Legal Consequences of the Construction of Wall in the Occupide Palestinian Territory” , It was a awaited that Kosovo Advisory Opinion would to be most remarkable consequences than formers. In its operative clause, the Court pointed out, by ten votes to four, “The declaration of oindependence of Kosovo adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law. ” This finding of the Court is lead to surprising of many international lawyers. For not only has came to challenge the question and presumption of General Assembly, but it has alarmed, despite of the Court's great role on keeping of international peace and security, to international legal order.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
International Court of Justice (The Court) rendered its advisory opinion on “ Accordance with International Law of Unilateral Declaratiof Independence in Respect of Kosovo” on 22 July 2010. Having issued opinion “Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons” and “Legal Consequences of the Construction of Wall in the Occupide Palestinian Territory” , It was a awaited that Kosovo Advisory Opinion would to be most remarkable consequences than formers. In its operative clause, the Court pointed out, by ten votes to four, “The declaration of oindependence of Kosovo adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law. ” This finding of the Court is lead to surprising of many international lawyers. For not only has came to challenge the question and presumption of General Assembly, but it has alarmed, despite of the Court's great role on keeping of international peace and security, to international legal order.
Key concepts: Advisory opinion, International court, Law, Political science, Principle of legality, Dissenting opinion, International law, Concurring opinion