2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

Revisiting the Utility of Transmission Gate and Passtransistor Logic Styles in CMOS VLSI Design

Shaik Fairooz, P. Thanapal, Packyanathan Ganesan, M. Sundar Prakash Balaji, V. Elamaran

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Modern microelectronic circuits are progressing from nanoseconds per instruction to picoseconds per instruction. The miniaturization of transistors, interconnects, and power supplies in integrated circuits have sparked this revolution. Because feature sizes are constantly shrinking, manufacturing process tools have less confidence in controlling design specifications (parameters). To minimize the number of transistors in a particular logic gate, the passtransitor logic can be used at the cost of weak logic output voltages. Transmission gate (TG) logic overcomes the weakness of the passtransistor logic at the expense of an extra transistor for each transmission gate. This study explores the implementation of a two-input OR gate (transmission gate logic), a two-input AND gate (passtransistor logic), and a two-input XOR gate (both) with the simulation results of area, power, and delay metrics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Modern microelectronic circuits are progressing from nanoseconds per instruction to picoseconds per instruction. The miniaturization of transistors, interconnects, and power supplies in integrated circuits have sparked this revolution. Because feature sizes are constantly shrinking, manufacturing process tools have less confidence in controlling design specifications (parameters). To minimize the number of transistors in a particular logic gate, the passtransitor logic can be used at the cost of weak logic output voltages. Transmission gate (TG) logic overcomes the weakness of the passtransistor logic at the expense of an extra transistor for each transmission gate. This study explores the implementation of a two-input OR gate (transmission gate logic), a two-input AND gate (passtransistor logic), and a two-input XOR gate (both) with the simulation results of area, power, and delay metrics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Modern microelectronic circuits are progressing from nanoseconds per instruction to picoseconds per instruction. The miniaturization of transistors, interconnects, and power supplies in integrated circuits have sparked this revolution. Because feature sizes are constantly shrinking, manufacturing process tools have less confidence in controlling design specifications (parameters). To minimize the number of transistors in a particular logic gate, the passtransitor logic can be used at the cost of weak logic output voltages. Transmission gate (TG) logic overcomes the weakness of the passtransistor logic at the expense of an extra transistor for each transmission gate. This study explores the implementation of a two-input OR gate (transmission gate logic), a two-input AND gate (passtransistor logic), and a two-input XOR gate (both) with the simulation results of area, power, and delay metrics.

Key concepts: Pass transistor logic, Logic family, Logic gate, AND-OR-Invert, Transmission gate, Resistor–transistor logic, Electronic engineering, NMOS logic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Revisiting the Utility of Transmission Gate and Passtransistor Logic Styles in CMOS VLSI Design — Research Paper | ScholarLens