2021•CirculationRequires access

Abstract P213: Characterizing The Distribution Of Coronary Artery Calcification In The 75-and-older Population: The Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities Study

Frances M. Wang, Miguel Cainzos‐Achirica, Shoshana H. Ballew, Aaron R. Folsom, Lynne E. Wagenknecht, Candace M. Howard, Josef Coresh, Matthew Jay Budoff, Michael Joseph Blaha, Kunihiro Matsushita

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction: The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a strong predictor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. Current clinical practice guidelines recommend using a CAC score of 100 or age-, sex-, and race-specific 75 th percentile as thresholds of high risk for guiding preventive therapy for ASCVD. On the low end of the spectrum, zero CAC attracts attention as a potent negative predictor of ASCVD and may be used to “de-risk” individuals who may safely defer aggressive preventive therapy. However, due to sparse data on CAC in the age 75+ population, the value of these CAC thresholds in older adults is uncertain. Objective: To understand the distribution of CAC (75 th percentile, CAC 100, and zero CAC) in adults aged 75+. Methods: We assessed 2,303 ARIC Visit 7 (2018-2019) participants age 75+ years without clinical coronary heart disease (CHD) who underwent CAC scanning (median age 80 years, 39% males). Demographic-specific percentiles of the CAC distribution across age were estimated nonparametrically with pooled residual ranking and locally weighted regressions. Results: Male-white and male-black participants had lower prevalence of zero CAC than female-white and female-black participants (4% and 10% versus 13% and 16%, respectively). CAC scores tended to increase with age across race and sex strata but appeared to peak at an old age threshold (between age~85-95) ( Figure ). Regardless of age, sex, and race, a majority of individuals in this age range had CAC >100 ( Figure , green 50 th percentile line exceeds red dashed CAC 100 line at most ages). Conclusions: In the largest US cohort of community-dwelling adults aged 75+ free of clinical CHD with CAC data, the prevalence of zero CAC was approximately 4-16%. We also confirmed a general age-dependent increase in CAC. Using CAC >100 as a threshold for high ASCVD risk would categorize the majority of older adults age 75+ as high risk. Alternatively, our demographic-specific CAC percentiles may be a valuable tool for interpreting CAC in the age 75+ population.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a strong predictor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. Current clinical practice guidelines recommend using a CAC score of 100 or age-, sex-, and race-specific 75 th percentile as thresholds of high risk for guiding preventive therapy for ASCVD. On the low end of the spectrum, zero CAC attracts attention as a potent negative predictor of ASCVD and may be used to “de-risk” individuals who may safely defer aggressive preventive therapy. However, due to sparse data on CAC in the age 75+ population, the value of these CAC thresholds in older adults is uncertain. Objective: To understand the distribution of CAC (75 th percentile, CAC 100, and zero CAC) in adults aged 75+. Methods: We assessed 2,303 ARIC Visit 7 (2018-2019) participants age 75+ years without clinical coronary heart disease (CHD) who underwent CAC scanning (median age 80 years, 39% males). Demographic-specific percentiles of the CAC distribution across age were estimated nonparametrically with pooled residual ranking and locally weighted regressions. Results: Male-white and male-black participants had lower prevalence of zero CAC than female-white and female-black participants (4% and 10% versus 13% and 16%, respectively). CAC scores tended to increase with age across race and sex strata but appeared to peak at an old age threshold (between age~85-95) ( Figure ). Regardless of age, sex, and race, a majority of individuals in this age range had CAC >100 ( Figure , green 50 th percentile line exceeds red dashed CAC 100 line at most ages). Conclusions: In the largest US cohort of community-dwelling adults aged 75+ free of clinical CHD with CAC data, the prevalence of zero CAC was approximately 4-16%. We also confirmed a general age-dependent increase in CAC. Using CAC >100 as a threshold for high ASCVD risk would categorize the majority of older adults age 75+ as high risk. Alternatively, our demographic-specific CAC percentiles may be a valuable tool for interpreting CAC in the age 75+ population.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is a strong predictor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. Current clinical practice guidelines recommend using a CAC score of 100 or age-, sex-, and race-specific 75 th percentile as thresholds of high risk for guiding preventive therapy for ASCVD. On the low end of the spectrum, zero CAC attracts attention as a potent negative predictor of ASCVD and may be used to “de-risk” individuals who may safely defer aggressive preventive therapy. However, due to sparse data on CAC in the age 75+ population, the value of these CAC thresholds in older adults is uncertain. Objective: To understand the distribution of CAC (75 th percentile, CAC 100, and zero CAC) in adults aged 75+. Methods: We assessed 2,303 ARIC Visit 7 (2018-2019) participants age 75+ years without clinical coronary heart disease (CHD) who underwent CAC scanning (median age 80 years, 39% males). Demographic-specific percentiles of the CAC distribution across age were estimated nonparametrically with pooled residual ranking and locally weighted regressions. Results: Male-white and male-black participants had lower prevalence of zero CAC than female-white and female-black participants (4% and 10% versus 13% and 16%, respectively). CAC scores tended to increase with age across race and sex strata but appeared to peak at an old age threshold (between age~85-95) ( Figure ). Regardless of age, sex, and race, a majority of individuals in this age range had CAC >100 ( Figure , green 50 th percentile line exceeds red dashed CAC 100 line at most ages). Conclusions: In the largest US cohort of community-dwelling adults aged 75+ free of clinical CHD with CAC data, the prevalence of zero CAC was approximately 4-16%. We also confirmed a general age-dependent increase in CAC. Using CAC >100 as a threshold for high ASCVD risk would categorize the majority of older adults age 75+ as high risk. Alternatively, our demographic-specific CAC percentiles may be a valuable tool for interpreting CAC in the age 75+ population.

Key concepts: Medicine, Percentile, Demography, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities, Population, Coronary artery calcium, Coronary artery disease, Agatston score

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Abstract P213: Characterizing The Distribution Of Coronary Artery Calcification In The 75-and-older Population: The Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens