2012•PubMedRequires access

Should family physicians use coronary artery calcium scores to screen for coronary artery disease? No: screening is unproven, expensive, and potentially harmful.

Mark H. Ebell

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

No: Screening is Unproven, Expensive, and Potentially Harmful. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores have been recommended as a way to screen for coronary artery disease (CAD). Before we get too enthusiastic about this expensive new test, remember that a good screening test must perform significantly better than existing or less invasive tests, that the cost and risk should be low, and that using the test should improve patient-oriented outcomes. Unfortunately, CAC scoring does not meet any of these criteria.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

No: Screening is Unproven, Expensive, and Potentially Harmful. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores have been recommended as a way to screen for coronary artery disease (CAD). Before we get too enthusiastic about this expensive new test, remember that a good screening test must perform significantly better than existing or less invasive tests, that the cost and risk should be low, and that using the test should improve patient-oriented outcomes. Unfortunately, CAC scoring does not meet any of these criteria.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

No: Screening is Unproven, Expensive, and Potentially Harmful. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores have been recommended as a way to screen for coronary artery disease (CAD). Before we get too enthusiastic about this expensive new test, remember that a good screening test must perform significantly better than existing or less invasive tests, that the cost and risk should be low, and that using the test should improve patient-oriented outcomes. Unfortunately, CAC scoring does not meet any of these criteria.

Key concepts: Medicine, Coronary artery disease, Coronary artery calcium, Test (biology), Disease, Artery, Screening test, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Should family physicians use coronary artery calcium scores to screen for coronary artery disease? No: screening is unproven, expensive, and potentially harmful. — Research Paper | ScholarLens